Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;34(2):776-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Strengths and weaknesses in reading skills of youth with intellectual disabilities

Affiliations

Strengths and weaknesses in reading skills of youth with intellectual disabilities

Marie Moore Channell et al. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Reading-related skills of youth with intellectual disability (ID) were compared with those of typically developing (TD) children of similar verbal ability level. The group with ID scored lower than the TD group on word recognition and phonological decoding, but similarly on orthographic processing and rapid automatized naming (RAN). Further, phonological decoding significantly mediated the relation between group membership and word recognition, whereas neither orthographic processing nor RAN did so. The group with ID also underperformed the TD group on phonological awareness and phonological memory, both of which significantly mediated the relation between group membership and phonological decoding. These data suggest that poor word recognition in youth with ID may be due largely to poor phonological decoding, which in turn may be due largely to poor phonological awareness and poor phonological memory. More focus on phonological skills in the classroom may help students with ID to develop better word recognition skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Multiple mediation model testing three potential mediators of the relation between group membership and word recognition. The bold arrows indicate that phonological decoding was a significant mediator. The mediation rendered the direct relation between group and word recognition below the level of significance, consistent with full mediation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multiple mediation model testing two potential mediators of the relation between group membership and phonological decoding. The bold arrows indicate that phonological awareness and phonological memory were each significant mediators. The mediation rendered the direct relation between group and phonological decoding below the level of statistical significance, consistent with full mediation.

References

    1. Abbeduto L, Warren SF, Conners FA. Language development in Down syndrome: From the prelinguistic period to the acquisition of literacy. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2007;13:247–261. - PubMed
    1. Allington RL. Sensitivity to orthographic structure in educable mentally retarded children. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1981;6:135–139.
    1. Allor JH, Mathes PG, Roberts JK, Cheatham JP, Champlin TM. Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools. 2010;47:445–466.
    1. Ackerman PT, Dykman RA. Phonological processes, confrontation naming, and immediate memory in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1993;26:597–609. - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.

LinkOut - more resources