Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Dec 6:345:e7666.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7666.

Effect of reducing total fat intake on body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of reducing total fat intake on body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies

Lee Hooper et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relation between total fat intake and body weight in adults and children.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to June 2010.

Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies of adults or children that compared lower versus usual total fat intake and assessed the effects on measures of body fatness (body weight, body mass index, or waist circumference) after at least six months (randomised controlled trials) or one year (in cohorts). Randomised controlled trials with any intention to reduce weight in participants or confounded by additional medical or lifestyle interventions were excluded.

Data extraction: Data were extracted and validity was assessed independently and in duplicate. Random effects meta-analyses, subgroups, sensitivity analyses, and metaregression were done.

Results: 33 randomised controlled trials (73,589 participants) and 10 cohort studies were included, all from developed countries. Meta-analysis of data from the trials suggested that diets lower in total fat were associated with lower relative body weight (by 1.6 kg, 95% confidence interval -2.0 to -1.2 kg, I(2)=75%, 57,735 participants). Lower weight gain in the low fat arm compared with the control arm was consistent across trials, but the size of the effect varied. Metaregression suggested that greater reduction in total fat intake and lower baseline fat intake were associated with greater relative weight loss, explaining most of the heterogeneity. The significant effect of a low fat diet on weight was not lost in sensitivity analyses (including removing trials that expended greater time and attention on low fat groups). Lower total fat intake also led to lower body mass index (-0.51 kg/m(2), 95% confidence interval -0.76 to -0.26, nine trials, I(2)=77%) and waist circumference (by 0.3 cm, 95% confidence interval -0.58 to -0.02, 15,671 women, one trial). There was no suggestion of negative effects on other cardiovascular risk factors (lipid levels or blood pressure). GRADE assessment suggested high quality evidence for the relation between total fat intake and body weight in adults. Only one randomised controlled trial and three cohort studies were found in children and young people, but these confirmed a positive relation between total fat intake and weight gain.

Conclusions: There is high quality, consistent evidence that reduction of total fat intake has been achieved in large numbers of both healthy and at risk trial participants over many years. Lower total fat intake leads to small but statistically significant and clinically meaningful, sustained reductions in body weight in adults in studies with baseline fat intakes of 28-43% of energy intake and durations from six months to over eight years. Evidence supports a similar effect in children and young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: CMS, WD, and HJM had financial support from the WHO for the submitted work; LH and CMS received funding from WHO to attend meetings of the NUGAG subgroup on diet and health; LH received research funding to carry out a systematic reviews for Barry Callebaut (to assess the effects of chocolate on markers of antioxidant status, funding ceased in August 2010); no further financial relationships existed with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Flow of papers through study
None
Fig 2 Quality assessment by criteria in included randomised controlled trials
None
Fig 3 Effect of low fat versus usual fat diet on body weight (kg), subgrouped by difference in percentage of energy from fat between control and reduced fat groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Preventability of cancer by food, nutrition, and physical activity: Appendix A. Policy and Action for Cancer Prevention. Food, Nutrition, and Physical Activity: a Global Perspective. AICR, 2009.
    1. Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rosner B, Monson RR, et al. A prospective study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1990;322:882-9. - PubMed
    1. Song Y-M, Sung J, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Body mass index and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a prospective study in Korean men. Stroke 2004;35:831-6. - PubMed
    1. Kelly S, Hillier F, Whittaker V, Ells LJ, Edmunds LD, Smith S, et al. The associations between food, nutrition, physical activity and the risk of weight gain, overweight and obesity and underlying mechanisms. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, 2006 www.dietandcancerreport.org/cancer_resource_center/downloads/SLR/Obesity....
    1. Yu-Poth S, Zhao G, Etherton T, Naglak M, Jonnalagadda S, Kris-Etherton PM. Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Step I And Step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:632-46. - PubMed

Publication types