Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 May;11(5):526-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.025. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening

Allison E Anderson  1 , Kevin A Henry, N Jewel Samadder, Ray M Merrill, Anita Y Kinney
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening

Allison E Anderson et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May.

Abstract

Background & aims: Little is known about the effects of geographic factors, such as rural vs urban residence and travel time to colonoscopy providers, on risk-appropriate use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the general population. We evaluated the effects of geographic factors on adherence to CRC screening and differences in screening use among familial risk groups.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 2010 Utah Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System, which included state-added questions on familial CRC. By using multiple logistic regression models, we assessed the effects of rural vs urban residence, travel time to the nearest colonoscopy provider, and spatial accessibility of providers on adherence to risk-appropriate screening guidelines. Study participants (n = 4260) were respondents aged 50 to 75 years.

Results: Sixty-six percent of the sample adhered to risk-appropriate CRC screening guidelines, with significant differences between urban and rural residents (68% vs 57%, respectively; P < .001) across all familial risk groups. Rural residents were less likely than urban dwellers to be up-to-date with screening guidelines (multivariate odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.79). In the unadjusted analysis, rural vs urban residence (P < .001), travel time to the nearest colonoscopy provider (P = .003), and spatial accessibility of providers (P = .012) were associated significantly with adherence to screening guidelines. However, rural vs urban residence (P < .001) was the only geographic variable independently associated with screening adherence in the adjusted analyses.

Conclusions: There are marked disparities in use of risk-appropriate CRC screening between rural and urban residents in Utah. Differences in travel time to the nearest colonoscopy provider and spatial accessibility of providers did not account for the geographic variations observed in screening adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Part of this work was presented at The American Society of Preventive Oncology 36th Annual Meeting, District of Columbia, March 3–6, 2012.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Actual travel time to the nearest colonoscopy provider for each populated one mile grid cell in Utah
Figure 2
Figure 2
Population-weighted median travel time to the nearest colonoscopy provider for each Utah Zip code
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) 1999–2007 incidence and mortality data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute; 2010. [Accessed January 11, 2012.]. http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. [Accessed January 11, 2012]. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscolo.htm.
    1. MMWR. Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality United States, 2002–2010. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(26):884–889. - PubMed
    1. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–359. - PubMed
    1. Halbert HC, Barg FK, Guerra CE, et al. Cultural, economic, and psychological predictors of colonoscopy in a national sample. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;6(11):1311–1316. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types