Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012;17(8):1521-31.
doi: 10.3851/IMP2497. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

A 72-week randomized study of the safety and efficacy of a stavudine to zidovudine switch at 24 weeks compared to zidovudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate when given with lamivudine and nevirapine

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A 72-week randomized study of the safety and efficacy of a stavudine to zidovudine switch at 24 weeks compared to zidovudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate when given with lamivudine and nevirapine

Nittaya Phanuphak et al. Antivir Ther. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Due to superior long-term toxicity profiles, zidovudine (AZT) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are preferred over stavudine (d4T) for first-line antiretroviral regimens. However, short-term d4T use could be beneficial in avoiding AZT-induced anaemia.

Methods: We randomized (1:1:1) 150 treatment-naive Thai HIV-infected adults with CD4(+) T-cell count <350 cells/mm(3) to arm 1 (24-week GPO-VIR S30(®) [d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) plus nevirapine (NVP)] followed by 48-week GPO-VIR Z250(®) [AZT plus 3TC plus NVP]), arm 2 (72-week GPO-VIR Z250(®)) or arm 3 (72-week TDF plus emtricitabine [FTC] plus NVP). Haemoglobin (Hb), dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, neuropathic signs, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CD4(+) T-cell count, plasma HIV RNA and adherence were assessed.

Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, mean Hb decreased from baseline to week 24 in arm 2 compared with arm 1 (-0.19 versus 0.68 g/dl; P=0.001) and arm 3 (0.48 g/dl; P=0.010). Neuropathic signs were more common in arm 2 compared with arm 3 (20.4 versus 4.2%; P=0.028) at week 24. There were no differences in changes in peripheral fat and eGFR from baseline to weeks 24 and 72 among arms. CD4(+) T-cell count increased more in arm 1 than arms 2 and 3 from baseline to week 24 (168 versus 117 and 118 cells/mm(3); P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively) but the increase from baseline to week 72 was similar among arms.

Conclusions: A 24-week d4T lead-in therapy caused less anaemia and greater initial CD4(+) T-cell count increase than initiating treatment with AZT. This strategy could be considered in patients with baseline anaemia or low CD4(+) T-cell count. If confirmed in a larger study, this may guide global recommendations on antiretroviral initiation where AZT is more commonly used than TDF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: JA has received speakers' fee or honorarium from Gilead, Abbott and ViiV. NP and JA are advisory committee members for the Thai Government Pharmaceutical Organization. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram SEARCH 003 patient disposition
GPO-VIR S30® is a fixed-dose combination that contains stavudine (d4T) 30 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg. GPO-VIR Z250® is a fixeddose combination that contains zidovudine (AZT) 250 mg, 3TC 150 mg and NVP 200 mg. Truvada® is a fixed-dose combination that contains tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg and emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg. Arm 1 received GPO-VIR S30® twice daily for 24 weeks followed by GPO-VIR Z250® twice daily for 48 weeks. Arm 2 received GPO-VIR Z250® twice daily for 72 weeks, and arm 3 received Truvada® once daily and NVP 200 mg twice daily for 72 weeks. AE, adverse event; ARV, antiretroviral; LPV/r, lopinavir/ritonavir; LTFU, lost to follow-up; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of toxicity primary endpoints between treatment arms by intention to treat analysis
Figure 2A. Mean hemoglobin change from baseline Figure 2B. Mean peripheral fat change from baseline assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry Figure 2C. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate change from baseline assessed by modification of diet in renal disease formula Figure 2D. Proportions of patients with neuropathic signs assessed by detailed neuropathy examination GPO-VIR S is a fixed dose combination that contains stavudine (d4T) 30 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg. GPO-VIR Z is a fixed dose combination that contains zidovudine (AZT) 250 mg, 3TC 150 mg, and NVP 200 mg. Truvada is a fixed dose combination that contains tenofovir 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg. All arms received standard doses of antiretrovirals. Arm 1 received GPO-VIR S twice daily for 24 weeks followed by GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 48 weeks. Arm 2 received GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 72 weeks, and arm 3 received Truvada once daily and NVP 200mg twice daily for 72 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of toxicity primary endpoints between treatment arms by intention to treat analysis
Figure 2A. Mean hemoglobin change from baseline Figure 2B. Mean peripheral fat change from baseline assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry Figure 2C. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate change from baseline assessed by modification of diet in renal disease formula Figure 2D. Proportions of patients with neuropathic signs assessed by detailed neuropathy examination GPO-VIR S is a fixed dose combination that contains stavudine (d4T) 30 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg. GPO-VIR Z is a fixed dose combination that contains zidovudine (AZT) 250 mg, 3TC 150 mg, and NVP 200 mg. Truvada is a fixed dose combination that contains tenofovir 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg. All arms received standard doses of antiretrovirals. Arm 1 received GPO-VIR S twice daily for 24 weeks followed by GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 48 weeks. Arm 2 received GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 72 weeks, and arm 3 received Truvada once daily and NVP 200mg twice daily for 72 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of toxicity primary endpoints between treatment arms by intention to treat analysis
Figure 2A. Mean hemoglobin change from baseline Figure 2B. Mean peripheral fat change from baseline assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry Figure 2C. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate change from baseline assessed by modification of diet in renal disease formula Figure 2D. Proportions of patients with neuropathic signs assessed by detailed neuropathy examination GPO-VIR S is a fixed dose combination that contains stavudine (d4T) 30 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg. GPO-VIR Z is a fixed dose combination that contains zidovudine (AZT) 250 mg, 3TC 150 mg, and NVP 200 mg. Truvada is a fixed dose combination that contains tenofovir 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg. All arms received standard doses of antiretrovirals. Arm 1 received GPO-VIR S twice daily for 24 weeks followed by GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 48 weeks. Arm 2 received GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 72 weeks, and arm 3 received Truvada once daily and NVP 200mg twice daily for 72 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of toxicity primary endpoints between treatment arms by intention to treat analysis
Figure 2A. Mean hemoglobin change from baseline Figure 2B. Mean peripheral fat change from baseline assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry Figure 2C. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate change from baseline assessed by modification of diet in renal disease formula Figure 2D. Proportions of patients with neuropathic signs assessed by detailed neuropathy examination GPO-VIR S is a fixed dose combination that contains stavudine (d4T) 30 mg, lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg, and nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg. GPO-VIR Z is a fixed dose combination that contains zidovudine (AZT) 250 mg, 3TC 150 mg, and NVP 200 mg. Truvada is a fixed dose combination that contains tenofovir 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg. All arms received standard doses of antiretrovirals. Arm 1 received GPO-VIR S twice daily for 24 weeks followed by GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 48 weeks. Arm 2 received GPO-VIR Z twice daily for 72 weeks, and arm 3 received Truvada once daily and NVP 200mg twice daily for 72 weeks.

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: Recommendations for a public health approach - 2010 revision. (Updated 2010. Accessed 26 December 2011.) Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599764_eng.pdf. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: Recommendations for a public health approach - 2006 revision. (Updated 2006. Accessed 26 December 2011.) Available from http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/artadultguidelines.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Gilks CF, Crowley S, Ekpini R, et al. The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings. Lancet. 2006;368:505–510. - PubMed
    1. Makinson A, Moing VL, Kouanfack C, Laurent C, Delaporte E. Safety of stavudine in the treatment of HIV infection with a special focus on resource-limited settings. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7:283–293. - PubMed
    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. 2010 (Updated 2011. Accessed 26 Decemberr 2011.) Available at http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/documents/20101123_GlobalReport_full_....

Publication types

MeSH terms