A 72-week randomized study of the safety and efficacy of a stavudine to zidovudine switch at 24 weeks compared to zidovudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate when given with lamivudine and nevirapine
- PMID: 23220732
- PMCID: PMC3715552
- DOI: 10.3851/IMP2497
A 72-week randomized study of the safety and efficacy of a stavudine to zidovudine switch at 24 weeks compared to zidovudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate when given with lamivudine and nevirapine
Abstract
Background: Due to superior long-term toxicity profiles, zidovudine (AZT) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are preferred over stavudine (d4T) for first-line antiretroviral regimens. However, short-term d4T use could be beneficial in avoiding AZT-induced anaemia.
Methods: We randomized (1:1:1) 150 treatment-naive Thai HIV-infected adults with CD4(+) T-cell count <350 cells/mm(3) to arm 1 (24-week GPO-VIR S30(®) [d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) plus nevirapine (NVP)] followed by 48-week GPO-VIR Z250(®) [AZT plus 3TC plus NVP]), arm 2 (72-week GPO-VIR Z250(®)) or arm 3 (72-week TDF plus emtricitabine [FTC] plus NVP). Haemoglobin (Hb), dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, neuropathic signs, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CD4(+) T-cell count, plasma HIV RNA and adherence were assessed.
Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, mean Hb decreased from baseline to week 24 in arm 2 compared with arm 1 (-0.19 versus 0.68 g/dl; P=0.001) and arm 3 (0.48 g/dl; P=0.010). Neuropathic signs were more common in arm 2 compared with arm 3 (20.4 versus 4.2%; P=0.028) at week 24. There were no differences in changes in peripheral fat and eGFR from baseline to weeks 24 and 72 among arms. CD4(+) T-cell count increased more in arm 1 than arms 2 and 3 from baseline to week 24 (168 versus 117 and 118 cells/mm(3); P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively) but the increase from baseline to week 72 was similar among arms.
Conclusions: A 24-week d4T lead-in therapy caused less anaemia and greater initial CD4(+) T-cell count increase than initiating treatment with AZT. This strategy could be considered in patients with baseline anaemia or low CD4(+) T-cell count. If confirmed in a larger study, this may guide global recommendations on antiretroviral initiation where AZT is more commonly used than TDF.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: is there still a role for stavudine?Antivir Ther. 2012;17(8):1507-9. doi: 10.3851/IMP2498. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Antivir Ther. 2012. PMID: 23220760
References
-
- World Health Organization. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: Recommendations for a public health approach - 2010 revision. (Updated 2010. Accessed 26 December 2011.) Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599764_eng.pdf. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: Recommendations for a public health approach - 2006 revision. (Updated 2006. Accessed 26 December 2011.) Available from http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/artadultguidelines.pdf. - PubMed
-
- Gilks CF, Crowley S, Ekpini R, et al. The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings. Lancet. 2006;368:505–510. - PubMed
-
- Makinson A, Moing VL, Kouanfack C, Laurent C, Delaporte E. Safety of stavudine in the treatment of HIV infection with a special focus on resource-limited settings. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7:283–293. - PubMed
-
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. 2010 (Updated 2011. Accessed 26 Decemberr 2011.) Available at http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/documents/20101123_GlobalReport_full_....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
