Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;28(1):69-74.
doi: 10.1177/1533317512467677. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

Communicative competence in Alzheimer's disease: metaphor and sarcasm comprehension

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Communicative competence in Alzheimer's disease: metaphor and sarcasm comprehension

Yohko Maki et al. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the deficits of metaphor and sarcasm comprehension in Alzheimer's disease (AD), as pragmatic interpretation such as metaphor and sarcasm comprehension is required in social communication. A total of 31 young normal controls, 104 aged normal controls (ANC), 42 patients with amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 30 patients with mild AD were evaluated by Metaphoric and Sarcastic Scenario Test, which consists of 5 metaphoric and 5 sarcastic questions with 5 answer choices. Scores were analyzed using the repeated measures analysis of variance (metaphor/sarcasm vs 4 participant groups). Sarcasm comprehension, which requires second-order Theory of Mind (ToM), started to deteriorate in ANC, and metaphor comprehension, which requires first-order ToM, started to deteriorate in aMCI, and both deteriorated as disease progressed. Literal interpretation of pragmatic language is characteristic in patients with mild AD. Such misinterpretation would result in social miscommunication, even if they still retained semantic-lexical competence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scores of correct answers. Sarcasm scores were significantly lower in ANC than YNC, whereas metaphor scores were not different between the 2 groups. Metaphor scores were deteriorated from MCI. Post hoc analysis of 2 × 4 analysis of variance (metaphor and sarcasm; 4 groups) was conducted; * in upper row indicates statistical significance of between subject analysis of metaphor, * in middle row indicates that of sarcasm, and * in the bottom row indicates statistical significance calculated by intrasubject analysis. *P < .05, P < .001. YNC indicates young normal controls; ANC, aged normal controls; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; AD, patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease in clinical dementia rating 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Error patterns. Error patterns of metaphor (A) and sarcasm (B). Significant differences among groups were observed in literal errors in both metaphor and sarcasm and the other 4 patterns of error were not significantly different among groups. AD indicates patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease in clinical dementia rating 1; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; ANC, aged normal controls; YNC, young normal controls; literal, literal interpretation; AP, answers associated with part of the sentence; MU, misunderstanding of the sentence; NK, not knowing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Colombo L, Fonti C, Cappa S. The impact of lexical-semantic impairment and of executive dysfunction on the word reading performance of patients with probable Alzheimer dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1192–1202. - PubMed
    1. Russell RL. Social communication impairments: pragmatics. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54(3):483–506. - PubMed
    1. Amodio DM, Frith CD. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(4):268–277. - PubMed
    1. Happe FG. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: a test of relevance theory. Cognition. 1993;48(2):101–119. - PubMed
    1. Colston HL, Gibbs RW, Jr. Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol. 2002;17(1):57–80.

Publication types