Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(12):e50113.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050113. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

What do you know about reproductive medicine?--results of a German representative survey

Yve Stoebel-Richter  1 , Kristina Geue, Ada Borkenhagen, Elmar Braehler, Kerstin Weidner
Affiliations

What do you know about reproductive medicine?--results of a German representative survey

Yve Stoebel-Richter et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: The use of reproductive medical treatments has become increasingly routine in recent years. This paper reports on a study of how different aspects of modern reproductive medicine are perceived by the German population.

Design: Findings from a nationally representative sample of 2110 men and women aged 18 to 50 are presented. Participants responded to a questionnaire seeking self-report information about attitudes and knowledge regarding different aspects of reproductive medicine.

Results: The majority of respondents had already heard or read something about reproductive medicine; knowledge gaps were prevalent in men and individuals with lower levels of education. The decrease in female fertility usually was underestimated, whereas both the number of involuntarily childless couples and the success rate of reproductive medical treatment were overestimated. One-third of participants would make use of reproductive medicine to have their own child.

Conclusion: This study revealed inadequacies in the knowledge of the German general population regarding reproductive medicine. Despite the low interest and poor knowledge of the topic, a broad acceptance of reproductive medical methods was reported. The results illustrate the need for adequate information transfer regarding female fertility as well as success rate and risks of reproductive medical interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Decision in favour for against having one (more) child.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG (1978) Birth after the reimplanation of a human embryo. Lancet 2: 366. - PubMed
    1. Heikkilä K, Länsimies E, Hippeläinen M, Heinonen S (2004) A survey of the attitudes of infertile and parous women towards the availability of assisted reproductive technology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111: 1229–1235. - PubMed
    1. Wischmann T (2005) Psychosocial aspects of fertility disorders. Der Urologe 44: 185–195. - PubMed
    1. Quach S, Librach C (2008) Infertility knowledge and attitudes in urban high school students. Fertil Steril; 90 (6): 2099–2106. - PubMed
    1. Nyboe-Anderson A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, et al. (2009) Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod; 24 (6): 1267–1287. - PubMed

Publication types