Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:941640.
doi: 10.1155/2012/941640. Epub 2012 Nov 25.

Renal Function and NODM in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Treated with Standard and Reduced Levels of Tacrolimus in Combination with EC-MPS

Affiliations

Renal Function and NODM in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Treated with Standard and Reduced Levels of Tacrolimus in Combination with EC-MPS

Laurence Chan et al. J Transplant. 2012.

Abstract

Information is lacking concerning concomitant administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with tacrolimus (EC-MPS+Tac) in renal transplant recipients (RTxR). In this 6-month, prospective, open-label, multicenter study, de novo RTxR were randomized (1 : 1) to low-dose (LD) or standard-dose (SD) Tac with basiliximab, EC-MPS 720 mg bid, and steroids. Primary objective was to compare renal function at 6-month posttransplantation. Secondary objectives were to compare the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss and death, and new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). 292 patients (LD n = 151, SD n = 141) were included. Mean Tac levels were at the low end of the target range in standard-exposure patients (SD, n = 141) and exceeded target range in low-exposure patients (LD = 151) throughout the study. There was no significant difference in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between treatments (ITT-population: 63.6 versus 61.0 mL/min). Incidence of BPAR was similar (10.6% versus 9.9%). NODM was significantly less frequent in LD Tac (17% versus 31%; P = 0.02); other adverse effects (AEs) were comparable. EC-MPS+Tac (LD/SD) was efficacious and well tolerated with well-preserved renal function. No renal function benefits were demonstrated, possibly related to poor adherence to reduced Tac exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean tacrolimus trough levels over time. Tac = tacrolimus; Group A = low-dose tacrolimus (n = 151); Group B = standard-dose tacrolimus (n = 141); “reclassified” defined as >50% of Tac levels (mandatory requirement for month 6 assessment) being within a protocol-specified Tac target range. Bars represent one standard deviation. Shaded areas represent protocol specified target ranges for tacrolimus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus at month 3, 6, and overall (safety population Group A, n = 114; Group B, n = 109). NODM = patients treated for hyperglycemia for a period of 14 consecutive days, or had 2 h OGTT posttest value ≥200 mg/dL, or had at least two fasting glucose values ≥126 mg/dL, or had one single random value (fasting or nonfasting) ≥mg/dL. Safety population, patients with diabetes mellitus active at start of study, was excluded.

References

    1. Matthias B. Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management. Drug Safety. 2001;24(9):645–663. - PubMed
    1. Shipkova M, Armstrong VW, Oellerich M, Wieland E. Mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplantation: focus on metabolism, safety and tolerability. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2005;1(3):505–526. - PubMed
    1. Budde K, Curtis J, Knoll G, et al. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium can be safely administered in maintenance renal transplant patients: results of a 1-year study. American Journal of Transplantation. 2004;4(2):237–243. - PubMed
    1. Salvadori M, Holzer H, De Mattos A, et al. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. American Journal of Transplantation. 2004;4(2):231–236. - PubMed
    1. Budde K, Bauer S, Hambach P, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal transplant patients. American Journal of Transplantation. 2007;7(4):888–898. - PubMed