Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model
- PMID: 23228113
- PMCID: PMC3643227
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0611
Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model
Abstract
Purpose: Conduct a laboratory evaluation of a novel low-pressure, broad focal zone electrohydraulic lithotripter (TRT LG-380).
Methods: Mapping of the acoustic field of the LG-380, along with a Dornier HM3, a Storz Modulith SLX, and a XiXin CS2012 (XX-ES) lithotripter was performed using a fiberoptic hydrophone. A pig model was used to assess renal response to 3000 shockwaves (SW) administered by a multistep power ramping protocol at 60 SW/min, and when animals were treated at the maximum power setting at 120 SW/min. Injury to the kidney was assessed by quantitation of lesion size and routine measures of renal function.
Results: SW amplitudes for the LG-380 ranged from (P(+)/P(-)) 7/-1.8 MPa at PL-1 to 21/-4 MPa at PL-11 while focal width measured ~20 mm, wider than the HM3 (8 mm), SLX (2.6 mm), or XX-ES (18 mm). For the LG-380, there was gradual narrowing of the focal width to ~10 mm after 5000 SWs, but this had negligible effect on breakage of model stones, because stones positioned at the periphery of the focal volume (10 mm off-axis) broke nearly as well as stones at the target point. Kidney injury measured less than 0.1% FRV (functional renal volume) for pigs treated using a gradual power ramping protocol at 60 SW/min and when SWs were delivered at maximum power at 120 SW/min.
Conclusions: The LG-380 exhibits the acoustic characteristics of a low-pressure, wide focal zone lithotripter and has the broadest focal width of any lithotripter yet reported. Although there was a gradual narrowing of focal width as the electrode aged, the efficiency of stone breakage was not affected. Because injury to the kidney was minimal when treatment followed either the recommended slow SW-rate multistep ramping protocol or when all SWs were delivered at fast SW-rate using maximum power, this appears to be a relatively safe lithotripter.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):382-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07231.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8. BJU Int. 2008. PMID: 17922871
-
Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11160.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22519983 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11207.x. Epub 2012 May 22. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22612388 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-head lithotripsy in synchronous mode: acute effect on renal function and morphology in the pig.BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06736.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17309558 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy.Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Mar;19(2):192-5. doi: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16e3. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. PMID: 19195131 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter.J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.117. Epub 2014 Oct 8. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25305356 Free PMC article.
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0672-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28247327 Review.
-
Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):502-509. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0560. Epub 2017 Apr 21. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 28340536 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1167-75. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319203111. Epub 2014 Mar 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24639497 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the body wall on lithotripter shock waves.J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):446-52. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0662. Epub 2014 Jan 8. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 24308532 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cleveland RO. McAteer JA. The physics of shock wave lithotripsy. In: Smith AD, editor; Badlani GH, editor; Preminger GM, editor; Kavoussi LR, editor. Smith's Textbook on Endourology. 3rd. Vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Medical Books, Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. pp. 529–558. Chapter 49.
-
- Leighton TG. Cleveland RO. Lithotripsy. Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: J Engineering Med. 2010;224:317–342. - PubMed
-
- Cleveland RO. Anglade R. Babayan RK. Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol. 2004;18:629–633. - PubMed
-
- Cleveland RO. The advantage of a broad focal zone in SWL. In: Evan AP, editor; Lingeman JE, editor; McAteer JA, editor; Williams JC, editor. Renal Stone Disease 2: Proceedings of the 2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium. Vol. 1049. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics IP Proceedings; 2008. pp. 219–225.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources