Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):105-11.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1221.

Integrating technology into standard weight loss treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Integrating technology into standard weight loss treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Bonnie Spring et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: A challenge in intensive obesity treatment is making care scalable. Little is known about whether the outcome of physician-directed weight loss treatment can be improved by adding mobile technology.

Methods: We conducted a 2-arm, 12-month study (October 1, 2007, through September 31, 2010). Seventy adults (body mass index >25 and ≤40 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) were randomly assigned either to standard-of-care group treatment alone (standard group) or to the standard and connective mobile technology system (+mobile group). Participants attended biweekly weight loss groups held by the Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic. The +mobile group was provided personal digital assistants to self-monitor diet and physical activity; they also received biweekly coaching calls for 6 months. Weight was measured at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up.

Results: Sixty-nine adults received intervention (mean age, 57.7 years; 85.5% were men). A longitudinal intent-to-treat analysis indicated that the +mobile group lost a mean of 3.9 kg more (representing 3.1% more weight loss relative to the control group; 95% CI, 2.2-5.5 kg) than the standard group at each postbaseline time point. Compared with the standard group, the +mobile group had significantly greater odds of having lost 5% or more of their baseline weight at each postbaseline time point (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.5-18.6).

Conclusions: The addition of a personal digital assistant and telephone coaching can enhance short-term weight loss in combination with an existing system of care. Mobile connective technology holds promise as a scalable mechanism for augmenting the effect of physician-directed weight loss treatment.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00371462.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Trial phases
PDA indicates personal digital assistant.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Participant flow
BMI indicates body mass index and VA, Veterans Affairs. Chronic pain was eliminated as a study entry criterion 1 year after the study began.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Weight Change over Time for +Mobile versus Standard Treatment
Weight loss plotted over time for the connective mobile technology (+mobile) and standard groups. Weight loss was significantly greater for the +mobile group at 3, 6, and 9 months.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Weight Loss over Time as a function of Treatment Assignment and MOVE! Adherence*
Participants in the connective mobile technology (+mobile) group who were adherent to MOVE! treatment (ie, attended 80% of treatment sessions) lost significantly more weight than less adherent +mobile participants and either adherent or nonadherent standard-of-care participants. Data were available from the following: standard adherers, 15 participants at baseline and 13 at month 12; standard nonadherers, 20 at baseline and 14 at month 12; +mobile adherers, 21 at baseline and 18 at month 12; and +mobile nonadherers, 13 at baseline and 9 at month 12.

Comment in

References

    1. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, et al. Weight loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Oct;107(10):1755–1767. - PubMed
    1. Wadden TA, Crerand CE, Brock J. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;28(1):151–+. - PubMed
    1. Leblanc ES, O’Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, Kapka T. Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):434–447. - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2165–2171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg RH, et al. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009 Apr;17(4):713–722. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data