Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;52(6):e168-74.
doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.12066.

Relationship between e-prescriptions and community pharmacy workflow

Olufunmilola K Odukoya  1 , Michelle A Chui
Affiliations

Relationship between e-prescriptions and community pharmacy workflow

Olufunmilola K Odukoya et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012.

Abstract

Objectives: To understand how community pharmacists use electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) technology and to describe the workflow challenges pharmacy personnel encounter as a result of using e-prescribing technology.

Design: Cross-sectional qualitative study.

Setting: Seven community pharmacies in Wisconsin from December 2010 to March 2011.

Participants: 16 pharmacists and 14 pharmacy technicians (in three chain and four independent pharmacies).

Interventions: Think-aloud protocols and pharmacy group interviews.

Main outcome measures: Pharmacy staff descriptions of their use of e-prescribing technology and challenges encountered in their daily workflow related to this technology.

Results: Two contributing factors were perceived to influence e-prescribing workflow: issues stemming from prescribing or transmitting software and issues from within the pharmacy. Pharmacies experienced both delayed and inaccurate e-prescriptions from physician offices. An overwhelming number of e-prescriptions with inaccurate or unclear information resulted in serious time delays for patients as pharmacists contacted physicians to clarify wrong information. In addition, lack of formal training and the disconnect between pharmacy procedures for verifying prescription accuracy and presentation of e-prescription information on the computer screen influenced the speed of processing an e-prescription.

Conclusion: E-prescriptions processing can hinder pharmacy workflow. As the number of e-prescriptions transmitted to pharmacies increases because of legislative mandates, it is essential that the technology supporting e-prescriptions (both on the prescriber and pharmacy operating systems) be redesigned to facilitate pharmacy workflow processes and to prevent unintended increase in medication errors, user frustration, and stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests in any product or service mentioned in this article, including grants, employment, gifts, stock holdings, or honoraria;

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workflow Map of E-prescribing Processing in Community Pharmacies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siska MH, Tribble DA. Opportunities and challenges related to technology in supporting optimal pharmacy practice models in hospitals and health systems. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(12):1116–1126. - PubMed
    1. Surescripts. [09/29, February 24, 2012];The national progress report on E-prescribing and interoperable healthcare. Accessed at www.surescripts.com/about-e-prescribing/progress-reports/national-progre....
    1. Lapane KL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Dube C, Quilliam BJ. A mixed method study of the merits of e-prescribing drug alerts in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):442–446. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(5):585–600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warholak TL, Rupp MT. Analysis of community chain pharmacists’ interventions on electronic prescriptions. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2009;49(1):59–64. - PubMed

Publication types