Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: a nationwide cohort study
- PMID: 23230315
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: a nationwide cohort study
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear which is more effective to increase survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in those with public-access defibrillation, bystander-initiated chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or conventional CPR with rescue breathing.
Methods and results: A nationwide, prospective, population-based observational study covering the whole population of Japan and involving consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with resuscitation attempts has been conducted since 2005. We enrolled all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac origin that were witnessed and received shocks with public-access automated external defibrillation (AEDs) by bystanders from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009. The main outcome measure was neurologically favorable 1-month survival. We compared outcomes by type of bystander-initiated CPR (chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR with compressions and rescue breathing). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the type of CPR and a better neurological outcome. During the 5 years, 1376 bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of cardiac origin in individuals who received CPR and shocks with public-access AEDs by bystanders were registered. Among them, 506 (36.8%) received chest compression-only CPR and 870 (63.2%) received conventional CPR. The chest compression-only CPR group (40.7%, 206 of 506) had a significantly higher rate of 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcome than the conventional CPR group (32.9%, 286 of 870; adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.70).
Conclusions: Compression-only CPR is more effective than conventional CPR for patients in whom out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is witnessed and shocked with public-access defibrillation. Compression-only CPR is the most likely scenario in which lay rescuers can witness a sudden collapse and use public-access AEDs.
Comment in
-
Compression-only CPR may improve survival for patients in cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythms treated by bystanders with public access defibrillation.Evid Based Med. 2013 Oct;18(5):e47. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101250. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Evid Based Med. 2013. PMID: 23503891 No abstract available.
-
Another step towards the acceptance of chest compression only CPR for primary cardiac arrest.Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Jan;17(1):21. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101289. Epub 2013 Apr 16. Evid Based Nurs. 2014. PMID: 23592697 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study.BMJ. 2011 Jan 27;342:c7106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7106. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21273279
-
Dissemination of Chest Compression-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Circulation. 2015 Aug 4;132(5):415-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014905. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Circulation. 2015. PMID: 26048093
-
Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Circulation. 2007 Dec 18;116(25):2900-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.723411. Epub 2007 Dec 10. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 18071072
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: 10 years of progress in research and treatment.J Intern Med. 2013 Jun;273(6):572-83. doi: 10.1111/joim.12064. Epub 2013 Apr 1. J Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23480824 Review.
-
Chest-compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation. 2019 Jan;134:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Resuscitation. 2019. PMID: 30391520
Cited by
-
Addressing the Global Burden of Trauma in Major Surgery.Front Surg. 2015 Sep 3;2:43. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00043. eCollection 2015. Front Surg. 2015. PMID: 26389122 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival factors of hospitalized out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Taiwan: A retrospective study.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0191954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191954. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29420551 Free PMC article.
-
A review of compression, ventilation, defibrillation, drug treatment, and targeted temperature management in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Feb 20;128(4):550-4. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.151115. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015. PMID: 25673462 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in clinical studies of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):85-93. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.001. World J Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 26056537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Updating the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines on Out-of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Japan.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031394. Epub 2024 Feb 16. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38362855 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical