Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;20(6):447-53.
doi: 10.1037/a0030593.

A comparison of therapies for the treatment of drug cues: counterconditioning vs. extinction in male rats

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of therapies for the treatment of drug cues: counterconditioning vs. extinction in male rats

Brendan J Tunstall et al. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Although extinction has been used as a treatment to reduce the power of drug cues, a better method is needed. Research with traditional reinforcers has shown that counterconditioning--pairing an appetitive cue with an aversive stimulus--can suppress cue-controlled behavior. The present experiment compared the counterconditioning and extinction of cocaine cues. Male rats were first trained to self-administer cocaine during a light cue. In the second phase, the light was paired with footshock in the counterconditioning group. The extinction group was treated similarly, except light presentations did not end in footshock. Counterconditioning suppressed cocaine seeking to a greater extent than extinction while the counterconditioning treatment was actively administered. On a subsequent stimulus compounding test, where footshock was discontinued and the light was presented simultaneously with an untreated cocaine cue (a tone), suppressive effects of counterconditioning were evident during the early portion of the test but not during later trials. Overall, results of the present experiment suggest that counterconditioning produces only temporarily suppressive effects on cue-controlled cocaine seeking. Methods for directly weakening the cue-drug association (e.g., "deepened extinction") may prove to be more useful drug cue treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (± SEM) response rates to tone (black bars) and to light (gray bars) on the final Phase 1 cocaine self-administration session for the Extinction and Counterconditioning Groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (± SEM) response rates to light on two-trial blocks over the 6 sessions of Phase 2 for the Extinction group (filled circles) and the Counterconditioning group (open squares). There were 10 trials (5 two-trial blocks) per session.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (± SEM) response rates to the tone-plus-light compound (TL; left panel), light alone (center panel), and tone alone (right panel) on two-trial blocks of the stimulus compounding test for the Extinction Group (black bars) and the Counterconditioning Group (white bars).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annau Z, Kamin LJ. The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1961;54:428–32. - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1995;57B:289–300.
    1. Bordnick PS, Elkins RL, Orr TE, Walters P, Thyer BA. Evaluating the relative effectiveness of three aversion therapies designed to reduce craving among cocaine abusers. Behavioral Interventions. 2004;19:1–24.
    1. Bouton ME, Peck CA. Spontaneous recovery in cross-motivational transfer (counterconditioning) Animal Learning & Behavior. 1992;20:313–321.
    1. Brethower DM, Reynolds GS. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1962;5:191–199. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types