Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 12:11:415.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-415.

Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria

Affiliations

Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria

Abu Naser Mohon et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories, although their application at the field level is currently not feasible. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) however, have been brought into field operation and widely adopted in recent days. This study evaluates OnSite (Pf/Pan) antigen test, a new RDT introduced by CTK Biotech Inc, USA for malaria diagnosis in a reference setting.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from febrile patients referred for malaria diagnosis by clinicians. Subjects were included in this study from two different Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) situated in two malaria endemic districts of Bangladesh. Microscopy and nested PCR were considered the gold standard in this study. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was performed on preserved whole blood samples.

Results: In total, 372 febrile subjects were included in this study. Of these subjects, 229 (61.6%) tested positive for Plasmodium infection detected by microscopy and nested PCR. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was 94.2% sensitive (95% CI, 89.3-97.3) and 99.5% specific (95% CI, 97.4-00.0) for Plasmodium falciparum diagnosis and 97.3% sensitive (95% CI, 90.5-99.7) and 98.7% specific (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Sensitivity varied with differential parasite count for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The highest sensitivity was observed in febrile patients with parasitaemia that ranged from 501-1,000 parasites/μL regardless of the Plasmodium species.

Conclusion: The new OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT is both sensitive and specific for symptomatic malaria diagnosis in standard laboratory conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO Global Malaria Programme. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. (The World Malaria Report 2011).
    1. National Malaria control program: National Report January to December Year 2011. [ http://www.nmcp.info/images/stories/documents/mis_report/misreport_nmcp_...]
    1. Alam MS, Chakma S, Khan WA, Glass GE, Mohon AN, Elahi R, Norris LC, Podder MP, Ahmed S, Haque R, Sack DA, Sullivan DJ Jr, Norris DE. Diversity of anopheline species and their Plasmodium infection status in rural Bandarban, Bangladesh. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:150. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-150. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alam MS, Khan MG, Chaudhury N, Deloer S, Nazib F, Bangali AM, Haque R. Prevalence of anopheline species and their Plasmodium infection status in epidemic-prone border areas of Bangladesh. Malar J. 2010;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CK, Bennett JW. Rapid diagnosis of malaria. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009, 2009. p. 415953. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources