Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;3(S1):31-8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298606.

A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability

Ronald Lehman  1 , Adam J Bevevino, Devon D Brewer, Andrea C Skelly, Paul A Anderson
Affiliations

A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability

Ronald Lehman et al. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review.Clinical questions: (1) What evidence is available from studies of cervical total disc arthroplasty (C-ADR) failure and retrieval regarding durability, wear, and reasons for failure of C-ADR? (2) What evidence is available from experimental models regarding the durability of C-ADR beyond 5 years?

Methods: We searched electronic databases to identify published reports of explanted cervical artificial discs and biomechanical simulations of disc wear.

Results: Nine articles were identified describing 17 devices explanted from human patients and four articles describing 23 devices explanted from non-human subjects. Wear properties were not consistently reported across studies, so summaries for specific variables are based on few cases. No device had been implanted longer than 4 years. In both human and non-human subjects, devices showed evidence of metallic and polymeric (for discs with polymer components) debris. Inflammatory cells were frequently present in surrounding soft tissues. Signs of infection were uncommon.Four patients had reactions interpreted as hypersensitivity to metal. We identified three articles on biomechanical wear simulations. Devices were tested between 10 and 20 million cycles in axial loading, flexion/extension, and lateral bending. No device failures were reported. One study suggests such simulations may represent 50 or more years of wear in actual patients.

Conclusion: Cervical disc implants consistently produced polymeric and metallic debris, which was typically accompanied by inflammation. Hypersensitivity to metal may increase risk for device failure. Biomechanical simulations indicate that cervical disc implants may be durable beyond the currently reported length of clinical follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No funding was received in support of this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results of literature search.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson P A, Rouleau J P, Bryan V E. et al. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28(20):S186–194. - PubMed
    1. Anderson P A, Rouleau J P, Toth J M. et al. A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses: invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(2):202–210. - PubMed
    1. Cavanaugh D A, Nunley P D, Kerr E J 3rd. et al. Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(7):E262–265. - PubMed
    1. Guyer R D, Shellock J, MacLennan B. et al. Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(7):E492–497. - PubMed
    1. Jensen W K, Anderson P A, Nel L. et al. Bone ingrowth in retrieved Bryan Cervical Disc prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(22):2497–2502. - PubMed