A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial
- PMID: 23237135
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.017
A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial
Abstract
Background: No randomized studies have thus far evaluated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. The aim was to evaluate if IVUS optimized DES implantation was superior to angiographic guidance alone in complex lesions.
Methods: Randomized, multicentre, international, open label, investigator-driven study evaluating IVUS vs angiographically guided DES implantation in patients with complex lesions (defined as bifurcations, long lesions, chronic total occlusions or small vessels). Primary study endpoint was post-procedure in lesion minimal lumen diameter. Secondary end points were combined major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis at 1, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
Results: The study included 284 patients. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics. The primary study end point showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the IVUS group (2.70 mm ± 0.46 mm vs. 2.51 ± 0.46 mm; P = .0002). During hospitalization, no patient died, had repeated revascularization, or a Q-wave MI. No difference was observed in the occurrence of non-Q wave MI (6.3% in IVUS vs. 7.0% in angio-guided group). At 24-months clinical follow-up, no differences were still observed in cumulative MACE (16.9%vs. 23.2 %), cardiac death (0%vs. 1.4%), MI (7.0%vs. 8.5%), target lesion revascularization (9.2% vs. 11.9%) or target vessel revascularization (9.8% vs. 15.5%), respectively in the IVUS vs. angio-guided groups. In total, only one definite subacute stent thrombosis occurred in the IVUS group.
Conclusions: A benefit of IVUS optimized DES implantation was observed in complex lesions in the post-procedure minimal lumen diameter. No statistically significant difference was found in MACE up to 24 months.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00936169.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug;29(15):1851-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn249. Epub 2008 Jun 11. Eur Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18550555
-
Impact of intravascular ultrasound imaging on early and late clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Sep;4(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21939937
-
Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Mar 20. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23523455 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2232-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27744039 Review.
-
Intravascular ultrasound guidance reduces cardiac death and coronary revascularization in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: results from a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials and 4724 patients.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;35(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01555-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30747368 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 12;13(14):4086. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144086. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1880-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.052. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32819477 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02772-w. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022. PMID: 35870904 Free PMC article.
-
Stent visualization methods to guide percutaneous coronary interventions and assess long-term patency.World J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 26;13(9):416-437. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i9.416. World J Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34621487 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.US Cardiol. 2020 May 4;14:e03. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.03. eCollection 2020. US Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 39720445 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical