Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark
- PMID: 23237273
- DOI: 10.1021/ci300478y
Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark
Abstract
Solution of the structures of ligand-receptor complexes via computational docking is an integral step in many structural modeling efforts as well as in rational drug discovery. A major challenge in ligand-receptor docking is the modeling of both receptor and ligand flexibilities in order to capture receptor conformational changes induced by ligand binding. In the molecular docking suite MedusaDock, both ligand and receptor side chain flexibilities are modeled simultaneously with sets of discrete rotamers, where the ligand rotamer library is generated "on the fly" in a stochastic manner. Here, we introduce backbone flexibility into MedusaDock by implementing ensemble docking in a sequential manner for a set of distinct receptor backbone conformations. We generate corresponding backbone ensembles to capture backbone changes upon binding to different ligands, as observed experimentally. We develop a simple clustering and ranking approach to select the top poses as blind predictions. We applied our method in the CSAR2011 benchmark exercise. In 28 out of 35 cases (80%) where the ligand-receptor complex structures were released, we were able to predict near-native poses (<2.5 Å RMSD), the highest success rate reported for CSAR2011. This result highlights the importance of modeling receptor backbone flexibility to the accurate docking of ligands to flexible targets. We expect a broad application of our fully flexible docking approach in biological studies as well as in rational drug design.
Similar articles
-
CSAR Benchmark of Flexible MedusaDock in Affinity Prediction and Nativelike Binding Pose Selection.J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1042-52. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00303. Epub 2015 Aug 17. J Chem Inf Model. 2016. PMID: 26252196
-
Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.J Mol Biol. 2004 Mar 12;337(1):209-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003. J Mol Biol. 2004. PMID: 15001363
-
Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018 Apr;16(2):1850004. doi: 10.1142/S021972001850004X. Epub 2018 Feb 4. J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018. PMID: 29495922
-
Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 Dec;10(12):1301-13. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1094458. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015. PMID: 26414598 Review.
-
Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.J BUON. 2007 Sep;12 Suppl 1:S101-18. J BUON. 2007. PMID: 17935268 Review.
Cited by
-
Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Sep;32(9):877-888. doi: 10.1007/s10822-018-0155-5. Epub 2018 Sep 1. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018. PMID: 30173397
-
ASR490, a Small Molecule, Overrides Aberrant Expression of Notch1 in Colorectal Cancer.Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Dec;19(12):2422-2431. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0949. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020. PMID: 33087513 Free PMC article.
-
MedusaDock 2.0: Efficient and Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking With Constraints.J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jun 24;59(6):2509-2515. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00905. Epub 2019 Apr 17. J Chem Inf Model. 2019. PMID: 30946779 Free PMC article.
-
Stabilizing Off-pathway Oligomers by Polyphenol Nanoassemblies for IAPP Aggregation Inhibition.Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 14;6:19463. doi: 10.1038/srep19463. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26763863 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Jun 27;62(12):2923-2932. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00127. Epub 2022 Jun 14. J Chem Inf Model. 2022. PMID: 35699430 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources