Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jun;16(6):1073-81.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005290. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato

Charlotte E L Evans et al. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to determine whether a multi-component school-based intervention can maintain children's fruit and vegetable intake post eligibility for free school fruit and vegetables.

Design: A random sample of fifty-four English primary schools was randomised to receive the 10-month intervention Project Tomato, a multi-component theory-based intervention, or the control. Each group consisted of twenty-seven schools.

Setting: Children's intake of fruit and vegetables is below recommendations. The English School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme has a short-term impact on intake while children are eligible for the scheme.

Subjects: Dietary measurements were collected from 658 Year 2 pupils aged 7-8 years at baseline and at follow-up 20 months later.

Results: Following an intention to treat analysis, the intervention as delivered compared with the control had no impact on the intake of fruit and vegetables (2 g/d, 95 % CI -23, 26 g/d) or on the number of portions of fruit (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.3, 0.3) or vegetables (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.2, 0.3) consumed daily by children. Intake of fruit and vegetables at school and home dropped by ≈ 100 g/d and 50 g/d, respectively, between baseline and follow-up in both the intervention and control groups.

Conclusions: Implementation of the intervention was low, with associated lack of impact on fruit and vegetable consumption in children. Alternatives to the delivery of an intervention by teachers and parents are needed to improve the dietary intake of primary-school children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of schools entering and completing the trial (NFER, National Foundation of Educational Research)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of pupils entering and completing the trial (NFER, National Foundation of Educational Research; CADET, Child and Diet Evaluation Tool)

References

    1. World Health Organization (2004) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: WHO.
    1. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perpsective. Washington, DC: WCRF/AICR.
    1. Block G, Patterson B & Sumar A (1992) Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 18, 1–29. - PubMed
    1. Maynard M, Gunnell D, Emmett P et al. (2003) Fruit and vegetables and antioxidants in childhood and risk of adult cancer: the Boyd Orr Cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 218–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher J, Mitchell D, Smiciklas-Wright H et al. (2002) Parental influences on young girls’ fruit and vegetable, micronutrient, and fat intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 58–64. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types