Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;20(6):4125-36.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1348-4. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

Studies on the bacteriological qualities of the Buffalo River and three source water dams along its course in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

Affiliations

Studies on the bacteriological qualities of the Buffalo River and three source water dams along its course in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

Vincent N Chigor et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

The Buffalo River and its dams are major surface water sources used for fresh produce irrigation, raw water abstraction and recreation in parts of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa. Over a 12-month period (August 2010 to July 2011), we assessed the bacteriological qualities of water from the river and 3 source water dams along its course. Faecal indicator bacteria (FIB), including total coliform (TC), faecal coliform (FC) and enterococci (ENT) counts, were high and ranged as follows: 1.9 × 10(2)-3.8 × 10(7), 0-3.0 × 10(5) and 0-5.3 × 10(5) cfu/100 ml for TC, FC and ENT, respectively. Significantly (P<0.05) higher concentrations of FC and ENT were observed at the sampling sites located at the lower reaches of the river compared to the upper reaches, and at Bridle Drift Dam compared to the other two dams. FIB counts mostly exceeded the recommended maximum values suggested by national and international guidelines for safe fresh produce irrigation, domestic applications, full-contact recreation and livestock watering. These results show that the bacteriological qualities of the Buffalo River and dams were poor, and suggest that sewage was dumped into the Buffalo River during the study period. Urban runoffs and effluents of wastewater treatment plants appear to be important sources of faecal contamination in the river. We conclude that these water bodies represent significant public health hazards. Provision of adequate sanitary infrastructure will help prevent source water contamination, and public health education aimed at improving personal, household and community hygiene is imperative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The study area and sampling sites, S1–S6 Maden Dam, Rooikrantz Dam, King William’s Town, Eluxolzweni, Bridle Drift Dam and Parkside. With kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media: Food and Environmental Virology, Quantitative Detection and Characterization of Human Adenoviruses in the Buffalo River in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, 4, 2012, 200, VN Chigor and AI Okoh, Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spatial variation in mean concentrations of faecal indicator bacteria at the six sites (S1–S6) located on the Buffalo River. Composite samples were collected monthly at the each site for a total of 12 months (August 2010 to July 2011) and each sample was analysed in triplicate. Reported values are the average counts for the entire 12-month period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Monthly variation in concentrations of total coliforms in water samples collected from the six sites (S1–S6) located on the Buffalo River. Each composite sample, collected monthly at each site, was analysed in triplicate. The triplicate values obtained for each sample were averaged to obtain the results reported
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Monthly variation in concentrations of faecal coliforms in water samples collected from the six sites (S1–S6) located on the Buffalo River. Each composite sample, collected monthly at each site, was analysed in triplicate. The triplicate values obtained for each sample were averaged to obtain the results reported
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Monthly variation in concentrations of enterococci in water samples collected from the six sites (S1–S6) located on the Buffalo River. Each composite sample, collected monthly at each site, was analysed in triplicate. The triplicate values obtained for each sample were averaged to obtain the results reported

References

    1. Abdelzaher AM, Wright ME, Ortega C, Solo-Gabriele HM, Miller G, Elmir S, Newman X, Bonilla JA, Bonilla TD, et al. Presence of pathogens and indicator microbes at a non-point source subtropical recreational marine beach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:724–732. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02127-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed W, Goonetilleke A, Powell D, Chauhan K, Gardner T. Comparison of molecular markers to detect fresh sewage in environmental waters. Water Res. 2009;43:4908–4917. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20thEdn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation: Washington DC, USA
    1. Anderson KL, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ. Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:3041–3048. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3041-3048.2005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ash RJ, Mauck B, Morgan M. Antibiotic resistance of gram-negative bacteria in rivers, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:713–716. doi: 10.3201/eid0807.010264. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types