Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;22(3):599-608.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2305-y. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

Mid-term survival following primary hinged total knee replacement is good irrespective of the indication for surgery

Affiliations

Mid-term survival following primary hinged total knee replacement is good irrespective of the indication for surgery

Paul Baker et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The use of 'hinged' knee prostheses for primary knee arthroplasty procedures is increasing. This analysis reports the rates of implant survival, modes of failure, revision details and functional outcomes with particular reference to the primary indication for surgery for a cohort of patients treated with primary hinged knee replacement.

Methods: Systematic review with supplementary analysis using data from the National Joint Registry and Department of Health. Analysis included 964 patients undergoing primary hinged knee replacement between April 2003 and December 2010. Survival at a maximum of 7 years was calculated for the group as a whole and dependent upon the indication for surgery (osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis vs. post-traumatic arthritis). Functional outcomes (pre- and post-operative Oxford Knee and Euroqol-5D scores and post-operative satisfaction) were available for 46 patients.

Results: In total, 20 cases required revision. The 5-year survival rate (96.8% [95% CI 95.1-98.4%]) was not dependent upon the primary surgical indication (p = n.s.). The commonest reasons for revision were infection (8 cases), peri-prosthetic fracture (4 cases) and aseptic loosening (3 cases). Patients reported substantial improvements in their Oxford Knee Score (mean improvement = 17.6, [95% CI 14.4-20.8]) and EQ5D index (mean improvement = 0.357, [95% CI 0.248-0.467]). Levels of post-operative satisfaction were high.

Conclusions: Hinged knee replacement can be considered as a viable alternative to more traditional unconstrained designs in the complex primary setting. These findings are clinically relevant as they support the increasing use of hinged knee replacements for the arthritic knee in which there is concomitant severe bone loss, deformity or instability. Surgeons using these implants can have confidence that their mid-term performance is comparable to more conventional knee designs.

Level of evidence: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121(1-2):26-30 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6):803-8 - PubMed
    1. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Nov;95(7):529-36 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):893-900 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Apr;15(4):710-20 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources