Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;137(2):589-98.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2305-0. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program

Affiliations

Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program

Joan E Cunningham et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Breast cancer mortality rates in South Carolina (SC) are 40 % higher among African-American (AA) than European-American (EA) women. Proposed reasons include race-associated variations in care and/or tumor characteristics, which may be subject to income effects. We evaluated race-associated differences in tumor biologic phenotype and stage among low-income participants in a government-funded screening program. Best Chance Network (BCN) data were linked with the SC Central Cancer Registry. Characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed in BCN participants aged 47-64 years during 1996-2006 were abstracted. Race-specific case proportions and incidence rates based on estrogen receptor (ER) status and histologic grade were estimated. Among 33,880 low-income women accessing BCN services, repeat breast cancer screening utilization was poor, especially among EAs. Proportionally, stage at diagnosis did not differ by race (607 cancers, 53 % among AAs), with about 40 % advanced stage. Compared to EAs, invasive tumors in AAs were 67 % more likely (proportions) to be of poor-prognosis phenotype (both ER-negative and high-grade); this was more a result of the 46 % lesser AA incidence (rates) of better-prognosis (ER+ lower-grade) cancer than the 32 % greater incidence of poor-prognosis disease (p values <0.01). When compared to the general SC population, racial disparities in poor-prognostic features within the BCN population were attenuated; this was due to more frequent adverse tumor features in EAs rather than improvements for AAs. Among low-income women in SC, closing the breast cancer racial and income mortality gaps will require improved early diagnosis, addressing causes of racial differences in tumor biology, and improved care for cancers of poor-prognosis biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES:

The authors state they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Race-associated differences in invasive breast cancer biologic phenotypes
a,b: Within the BCN, case proportions (a) and age-adjusted incidence rates (b) demonstrate different perspectives on racial disparities. Rates are cases per 100,000 person-years-at-risk over ages 47–64. Asterisks indicate statistical significance of race-group comparisons for specific breast cancer phenotypic subtypes: * = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01. c: Proportional subtype incidence rates are race-specific, proportional to the total European-American invasive breast cancer incidence rate within each population (BCN or state-level). Gaps in the bars for African-Americans, between ER positive and ER negative subtypes, represent race-associated differences in total incidence within each population. Lines indicate differences in ER positive and ER negative proportions: solid lines for race-associated differences within each population, long-dashed lines for differences between African-Americans in the two populations, and short-dashed dashed lines for differences between European-Americans in the two populations. AA = African-American; EA = European-American; ER = estrogen receptor; G = histologic grade;

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [Accessed 06/13/12];South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control: South Carolina Community Assessment Network. http://scangis.dhec.sc.gov/scan/cancer2/mortinput.aspx.
    1. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2011–2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc; 2011.
    1. Cunningham JE, Butler WM. Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: Clinical evidence for a biological basis even in small tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88:161–176. - PubMed
    1. Cunningham JE, Montero AJ, Garrett-Mayer E, Berkel HJ, Ely B. Racial differences in the incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by combined histologic grade and hormone receptor status. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(3):399–409. Epub 2009 Dec 19. - PubMed
    1. Adams SA, Hebert JR, Bolick-Aldrich S, Daguise VG, Mosley CM, Modayil MV, Berger SH, Teas J, Mitas M, Cunningham JE, Steck SE, Burch J, Butler WM, Horner M-J D, Brandt HM. Breast cancer disparities in South Carolina: Early detection, special programs and descriptive epidemiology. J South Carolina Med Assoc. 2006;102(7):231–239. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances