Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Jan;137(2):471-82.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2369-x. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer

Massimo Cristofanilli et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib-pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagrams for Cohorts 1 and 2. LAP lapatinib, PBO placebo, PAZ pazopanib, ITT intent-to-treat
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival in Cohort 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival in Cohort 2

References

    1. Cristofanilli M, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Update on the management of inflammatory breast cancer. Oncologist. 2003;8:141–148. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-2-141. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dirix LY, Van Dam P, Prové A, Vermeulen PB. Inflammatory breast cancer: current understanding. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006;18:563–571. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000245307.29026.0a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charafe-Jauffret E, Tarpin C, Bardou VJ, Bertucci F, Ginestier C, Braud AC, Puig B, Geneix J, Hasson J, Birnbaum D, Jacquemier J, Viens P. Immunophenotypic analysis of inflammatory breast cancers: identification of an ‘inflammatory signature’. J Pathol. 2004;202(3):265–273. doi: 10.1002/path.1515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charafe-Jauffret E, Tarpin C, Viens P, Bertucci F. Defining the molecular biology of inflammatory breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2008;35(1):41–50. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.11.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parton M, Dowsett M, Ashley S, Hills M, Lowe F, Smith IE. High incidence of HER-2 positivity in inflammatory breast cancer. Breast. 2004;13(2):97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2003.08.004. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms