Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;20(2):197-204.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.00356-12. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

Comparison of four commercially available avidity tests for Toxoplasma gondii-specific IgG antibodies

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of four commercially available avidity tests for Toxoplasma gondii-specific IgG antibodies

O Villard et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Toxoplasma infection in pregnant women may cause congenital toxoplasmosis. Diagnosis of infection is based on serological tests aimed at detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii. However, IgM antibodies are not an accurate marker for discriminating between acute and latent infection. Detection of residual or persistent IgM may occur months or even years after primary infection, while the IgG avidity test is a rapid means of identifying latent infections in pregnant women who exhibit both IgG and IgM anti-Toxoplasma antibodies on initial testing during pregnancy. In this study, we assessed and compared the performances of four commercially available Toxoplasma IgG avidity tests in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients with acute and latent toxoplasmosis. The positive predictive value of high avidity to confirm latent toxoplasmosis was 100% for all the assays, indicating that high avidity is a hallmark of latent infection. However, the negative predictive value of high avidity ranged from 99.2% (bioMérieux) to 95.3% (Abbott), indicating that acute toxoplasmosis could not be reliably diagnosed based on low IgG avidity alone. Thus, the avidity test provides a rapid means for identifying latent Toxoplasma infection in immunocompetent pregnant women presenting both IgG and IgM anti-Toxoplasma antibodies on initial testing. In terms of cost-effectiveness, avidity testing is a powerful tool that optimizes screening and follow-up of pregnant women while minimizing the costs of screening by avoiding subsequent costly maternal and fetal investigation and unnecessary treatment. The cheapest assay, Vidas Toxo IgG Avidity, also had the best performance for the diagnosis of latent toxoplasmosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Mean kinetics of IgG levels (A) and IgG avidity values (B) with four immunoassays in 67 sera of 56 pregnant women with acute toxoplasmosis.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kinetics of IgG avidity for the four immunoassays in 67 samples taken from 56 pregnant women with acute toxoplasmosis and confirmed seroconversion. All the women were treated for acute toxoplasmosis after the first serum was tested. The horizontal lines represent the upper and lower cutoffs of the gray zone for each assay. Each symbol represents a single patient.
Fig 3
Fig 3
IgG avidity results with the four immunoassays in IgG- and IgM-positive sera in latent toxoplasmosis (n = 55). The black squares represent treated or immunocompromised patients; the circles represent the immunocompetent patiens. The horizontal lines represent the upper and lower cutoffs of the gray zone for each assay.
Fig 4
Fig 4
IgG avidity results with the four immunoassays in IgG-positive and IgM-negative sera in the latent toxoplasmosis population (n = 84). The black squares represent treated or immunocompromised patients; circles represent immunocompetent patients. The horizontal lines represent the upper and lower cutoffs of the gray zone for each assay.

References

    1. Montoya JG, Remington JS. 2008. Management of Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:554–566 - PubMed
    1. Couvreur J. 1962. Congenital toxoplasmosis. Vie Med. 43:1839–1842 - PubMed
    1. Foulon W, Pinon JM, Stray-Pedersen B, Pollak A, Lappalainen M, Decoster A, Villena I, Jenum PA, Hayde M, Naessens A. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: a multicenter evaluation of different diagnostic parameters. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 181:843–847 - PubMed
    1. Villard O, Jung-Etienne J, Cimon B, Franck J, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Godineau N, Houze S, Paris L, Pelloux H, Villena I, Candolfi E, Le Reseau du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose. 2011. Sérodiagnostic de la toxoplasmose en 2010: conduite à tenir et interpretation en fonction des profils sérologiques obtenus par les méthodes de dépisage. Feuillets Biol. 52:1–7
    1. Pratlong F. 2002. Toxoplasmosis and pregnancy: current trends in serological follow-up. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 30:237–243 - PubMed

Publication types