Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
- PMID: 23243104
- PMCID: PMC3717764
- DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601
Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians.
Methods: Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site.
Results: Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians.
Conclusions: Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control & Prevention WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). [web page]. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/. (accessed 30 May 2012). - PubMed
-
- Naci H, Chisholm D, Baker TD. Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison. Inj Prev 2009;15:55–9 - PubMed
-
- Sidewalks, crosswalks — Pedestrians, bicycles. In: Legislature WS. ed Vol RCW 46.61.2612010 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=46.61.261 (accessed 30 Nov 2012)
-
- Crosswalks. In: Legislature WS. edVol RCW 46.61.2352010
-
- Bungum TJ, Day C, Henry LJ. The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk. J Community Health 2005;30:269–79 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical