Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 23243265
- PMCID: PMC3717601
- DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194
Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has become increasingly more popular for the removal of pituitary adenomas. It is also widely recognised that transsphenoidal microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas is a well-established procedure with good outcomes. Our objective was to meta-analyse the short-term results of endoscopic and microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery. We undertook a systematic review of the English literature on results of transsphenoidal surgery, both microscopic and endoscopic from 1990 to 2011. Series with less than 10 patients were excluded. Pooled data were analysed using meta-analysis techniques to obtain estimate of death, complication rates and extent of tumour removal. Complications evaluated included cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, vascular complications, visual complications, diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism and cranial nerve injury. Data were also analysed for tumour size and sex. 38 studies met the inclusion criteria yielding 24 endoscopic and 22 microscopic datasets (eight studies included both endoscopic and microscopic series). Meta-analysis of the available literature showed that the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique was associated with a higher incidence of vascular complications (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the two techniques in all other variables examined. Meta-analysis of the available literature reveals that endoscopic removal of pituitary adenoma, in the short term, does not seem to confer any advantages over the microscopic technique and the incidence of reported vascular complications was higher with endoscopic than with microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas. While we recognise the limitations of meta-analysis, our study suggests that a multicentre, randomised, comparative effectiveness study of the microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal techniques may be a reasonable approach towards establishing a true valuation of these techniques.
Keywords: Neurosurgery; Surgery.
Figures
Comment in
-
Endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary surgery.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):827. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304583. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23345283 No abstract available.
-
Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: the shortcomings of meta-analysis.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):829. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304541. Epub 2013 Feb 16. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23418208 No abstract available.
-
Case series analysis, meta-analysis or no analysis in the evaluation of neurosurgical techniques: get better or get out.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):828. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305130. Epub 2013 Mar 5. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23463869 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, et al. Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 1997;40:225–37 - PubMed
-
- Cavallo LM, Dal Fabbro M, Jalalod'din H, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Before scrubbing in: tips and tricks. Surg Neurol 2007;67:342–7 - PubMed
-
- Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;87:44–51 - PubMed
-
- Powell M, Gnanalinghan KK. Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: is it here to stay? Br J Neurosurg 2007;21:315–17 - PubMed
-
- Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barron Y, et al. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2009;111:545–54 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous