Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory
- PMID: 23243315
- PMCID: PMC3520136
- DOI: 10.1177/0002716211424709
Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory
Abstract
Quantitative researchers distinguish between causal and effect indicators. What are the analytic problems when both types of measures are present in a quantitative reasoned action analysis? To answer this question, we use data from a longitudinal study to estimate the association between two constructs central to reasoned action theory: behavioral beliefs and attitudes toward the behavior. The belief items are causal indicators that define a latent variable index while the attitude items are effect indicators that reflect the operation of a latent variable scale. We identify the issues when effect and causal indicators are present in a single analysis and conclude that both types of indicators can be incorporated in the analysis of data based on the reasoned action approach.
Figures


References
-
- Ajzen Icek, Fishbein Martin. Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M, editors. European Review of Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000.
-
- Anderson James, Gerbing David. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;127:142–161.
-
- Bollen Kenneth, Lennox Richard. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;110:305–314.
-
- Bollen Kenneth, Paxton Pamela. Detection and determinants of bias in subjective measures. American Sociological Review. 1998;63(3):465–478.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources