Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;39(5):1224-31.
doi: 10.1037/a0030947. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues

Yoni Pertzov et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that memory performance can be enhanced by a cue which indicates the item most likely to be subsequently probed, even when that cue is delivered seconds after a stimulus array is extinguished. Although such retro-cuing has attracted considerable interest, the mechanisms underlying it remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that retro-cues might protect an item from degradation over time. We employed two techniques that previously have not been deployed in retro-cuing tasks. First, we used a sensitive, continuous scale for reporting the orientation of a memorized item, rather than binary measures (change or no change) typically used in previous studies. Second, to investigate the stability of memory across time, we also systematically varied the duration between the retro-cue and report. Although accuracy of reporting uncued objects rapidly declined over short intervals, retro-cued items were significantly more stable, showing negligible decline in accuracy across time and protection from forgetting. Retro-cuing an object's color was just as advantageous as spatial retro-cues. These findings demonstrate that during maintenance, even when items are no longer visible, attention resources can be selectively redeployed to protect the accuracy with which a cued item can be recalled over time, but with a corresponding cost in recall for uncued items.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental Design and Results (A) Version A: Spatial cueing. (B) Error in recall for the three different conditions: Blue: Valid, cue matches the probe; Red: Invalid, cue does not match the probe; Green: No Cue, no cue was presented. The linear regression lines for errors following cue onset are plotted in different colors according to the cueing condition. (C) Version B: Color cuing. (D) Results similar to B. Error bars denote SEM across participants (N = 12).

References

    1. Alvarez G. A., & Cavanagh P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x - PubMed
    1. Astle D. E., Scerif G., Kuo B. C., & Nobre A. C. (2009). Spatial selection of features within perceived and remembered objects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astle D. E., Summerfield J., Griffin I., & Nobre A. C. (2012). Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 146–162. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001
    1. Bahcall D. O., & Kowler E. (1999). Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research, 39, 71–86. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00090-X - PubMed

Publication types