Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens implantation after ocular trauma
- PMID: 23245361
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.063
Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens implantation after ocular trauma
Abstract
Purpose: To report the results and safety of sutureless intrascleral haptic fixation in traumatized eyes and to compare this procedure with retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) fixation.
Setting: University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Design: Interventional case series.
Methods: Patients with traumatic cataract and severely damaged capsular bags were divided into 2 groups (Group 1: intrascleral IOLs [Acrysof MN60 AC]; Group 2: retropupillary iris-claw IOLs [Verisyse]). The main outcome was the final visual acuity. The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated by the vectorial method.
Results: Twenty-six eyes of 23 patients were studied, 8 eyes in Group 1 and 18 eyes in Group 2. The mean follow-up was 14 months. There was no difference in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at the time of the surgery (P>.05). The mean CDVA (logMAR) was 1.68 ± 1.15 (SD) preoperatively and 0.55 ± 0.9 postoperatively in Group 1 (P = .03) and 1.11 ± 1.13 and 0.32 ± 0.47, respectively, in Group 2 (P = .003). The final CDVA was not different between groups (P>.05). The mean SIA was 1.91 ± 1.66 diopters (D) in Group 1 and 2.74 ± 1.92 D in Group 2 (P>.05). No intraoperative complications occurred in Group 2; a haptic broke in Group 1. Macular edema occurred in both groups.
Conclusions: Sutureless intrascleral IOLs corrected posttraumatic aphakia. The SIA was comparable between groups. This procedure should be considered after trauma when other implantation techniques are not possible.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
