Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 17:12:145.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-145.

Barriers to the use of reminder/recall interventions for immunizations: a systematic review

Jennifer A Pereira  1 , Susan Quach, Christine L Heidebrecht, Sherman D Quan, Faron Kolbe, Michael Finkelstein, Jeffrey C Kwong; Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Vaccine Coverage Theme Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Barriers to the use of reminder/recall interventions for immunizations: a systematic review

Jennifer A Pereira et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Although many studies have demonstrated the benefits of reminder/recall (RR) measures to address patient under-immunization and improve immunization coverage, they are not widely implemented by healthcare providers. We identified providers' perceived barriers to their use from existing literature.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of relevant articles published in English between January 1990 and July 2011 that examined the perceptions of healthcare providers regarding barriers to tracking patient immunization history and implementing RR interventions. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Academic Search Premier, and PsychINFO. Additional strategies included hand-searching the references of pertinent articles and related reviews, and searching keywords in Google Scholar and Google.

Results: Ten articles were included; all described populations in the United States, and examined perceptions of family physicians, pediatricians, and other immunization staff. All articles were of moderate-high methodological quality; the majority (n=7) employed survey methodology. The most frequently described barriers involved the perceived human and financial resources associated with implementing an RR intervention, as well as low confidence in the accuracy of patient immunization records, given the lack of data sharing between multiple immunization providers. Changes to staff workflow, lack of appropriate electronic patient-tracking functionalities, and uncertainty regarding the success of RR interventions were also viewed as barriers to their adoption.

Conclusions: Although transitioning to electronic immunization records and registries should facilitate the implementation of RR interventions, numerous perceived barriers must still be overcome before the full benefits of these methods can be realized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This figure depicts the filter process for articles identified by our search strategies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Vaccination Coverage Reported via NIS. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/nis/default.htm Accessed on Oct 1, 2012.
    1. Environics Research Group for the Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Adult National Immunization Coverage Survey. HC POR # POR-05-75: http://resources.cpha.ca/CCIAP/data/544e.pdf.
    1. Frescura AM, Belzak L. Results from the 2006 National Immunization Coverage Survey. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008;19(5):357.
    1. Mieczkowski TA, Wilson SA. Adult pneumococcal vaccination: a review of physician and patient barriers. Vaccine. 2002;20(9–10):1383–1392. - PubMed
    1. Kimmel SR, Burns IT, Wolfe RM, Zimmerman RK. Addressing immunization barriers, benefits, and risks. J Fam Pract. 2007;56(2 Suppl):S61–S69. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources