The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury
- PMID: 23247013
- DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.162
The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury
Abstract
Objectives: Mechanical orthoses, such as the hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) and the isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis (IRGO), are both used for walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the energy expenditure during walking with these orthoses compared with a powered gait orthosis (PGO) in patients with SCI.
Methods: Five patients with SCI who were experienced users of HKAFOs participated in this study. Subjects were also fitted with an IRGO and PGO and underwent a specific gait training program. Patients walked along a flat walkway using the three types of orthosis at their self-selected walking speed. A stop watch and a polar heart rate monitor were used to measure the speed of walking and heart rate.
Results: Walking speed, the distance walked and the physiological cost index (PCI) all improved with both the new PGO and the IRGO as compared with the HKAFO.
Conclusions: A PGO can improve walking speed and the distance walked and reduce the PCI of walking as compared with mechanical orthoses, probably due to the activated movements of the lower limb joints.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a novel powered gait orthosis for walking by a spinal cord injury patient.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Jun;36(2):239-46. doi: 10.1177/0309364611435690. Epub 2012 Feb 24. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012. PMID: 22368113
-
The Physiological Cost Index of walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis among patients with T(12) - L(1) spinal cord injury.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Mar;33(1):61-8. doi: 10.1080/03093640802562368. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009. PMID: 19235067
-
The effect of trunk extension on physiological cost index in spinal cord injury patients when using the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis: A pilot study.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Dec;40(6):696-702. doi: 10.1177/0309364615592700. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016. PMID: 26209422 Clinical Trial.
-
Reciprocal gait orthoses and powered gait orthoses for walking by spinal cord injury patients.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Feb;37(1):14-21. doi: 10.1177/0309364612444665. Epub 2012 May 15. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013. PMID: 22588849 Review.
-
The efficacy of powered orthoses on walking in persons with paraplegia.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Apr;39(2):90-9. doi: 10.1177/0309364613520031. Epub 2014 Feb 18. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015. PMID: 24549210 Review.
Cited by
-
A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Dec 19;11:169. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-169. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 25523497 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury in Humans: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 14;13(4):1090. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041090. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398403 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of orthosis options on walking parameters in spinal cord-injured patients: a literature review.Spinal Cord. 2016 Jun;54(6):412-22. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.238. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Spinal Cord. 2016. PMID: 26857271 Review.
-
Influence of Reciprocating Link When Using an Isocentric Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (IRGO) on Walking in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Summer;23(3):256-262. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00016. Epub 2017 May 4. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 29339901 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized, crossover clinical trial on the safety, feasibility, and usability of the ABLE exoskeleton: A comparative study with knee-ankle-foot orthoses.PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0318039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318039. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40424335 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous