Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):114-24.
doi: 10.4161/org.23306. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing

Affiliations
Review

Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing

Timothy T Roberts et al. Organogenesis. 2012 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

The biology of fracture healing is better understood than ever before, with advancements such as the locking screw leading to more predictable and less eventful osseous healing. However, at times one's intrinsic biological response, and even concurrent surgical stabilization, is inadequate. In hopes of facilitating osseous union, bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics are being relied on more than ever before. The osteoinductive, osteoconductive and osteogenic properties of these substrates have been elucidated in the basic science literature and validated in clinical orthopaedic practice. Furthermore, an industry built around these items is more successful and in demand than ever before. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the basic science, clinical utility and economics of bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics.

Keywords: bone graft; bone graft substitute; fractures; nonunion; orthobiologics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>Figure 1</b>:
Figure 1:
(A) AP Radiograph of a hypertrophic nonunion of a subtrochanteric femur fracture, eleven months following cephalomedullary rod fixation. Coronal (B) and sagittal (C) CT images of the hypertrophic nonunion. (D) AP radiograph of the knee, showing insufficient effectively-unicortical screw fixation, which led to excess implant motion at the fracture site.
<b>Figure 2</b>:
Figure 2:
(B) PA and (C) lateral radiographs of a distal humeral atrophic nonunion, thirteen-months following open reduction and internal fixation of a comminuted, open distal humerus fracture. (A) Extensive soft tissue damage and periosteal stripping at the time of injury likely contributed to inadequate vasculature and for healing.
<b>Figure 3</b>:
Figure 3:
AP radiograph of a periprosthetic femur fracture following cable fixation augmented with a cortical strut femoral allograft.
<b>Figure 4</b>:
Figure 4:
(A) AP radiograph of a large, segmental femur fracture with a sizeable diaphyseal defect. (B) postoperative AP radiograph of the fracture following bridge plating and implantation of iliac crest bone graph, DBM and BMP. (C) AP radiograph taken ten months following injury showing expansive bone formation and subsequent hypertrophic nonunion following hardware failure, treated with rigid intramedullary fixation.

References

    1. Kwong FNK, Harris MB. Recent developments in the biology of fracture repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:619–25. - PubMed
    1. Fayaz HC, Giannoudis PV, Vrahas MS, Smith RM, Moran C, Pape HC, et al. The role of stem cells in fracture healing and nonunion. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1587–97. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1338-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell AT, Taylor CJ, Lavelle DG. (1991) Fractures of tibia and fibula. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM (eds) Fractures in Adults, Rockwood and Green, vol 3. pp 1915– 1982.
    1. Taylor CJ. (1992) Delayed union and nonunion of fractures. In: Crenshaw AH (ed) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, vol 28.Mosby, pp 1287—1345.
    1. Khan SN, Cammisa FP, Jr., Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:77–86. - PubMed