Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;4(1):93-102.
doi: 10.1007/s13244-012-0210-z. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

European Teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey

E R Ranschaert  1 , F H Barneveld Binkhuysen
Affiliations

European Teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey

E R Ranschaert et al. Insights Imaging. 2013 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: To obtain an overview of teleradiology usage within Europe, to evaluate the current opinion and future vision about this technique.

Methods: A web-based survey targeted at active radiologists throughout Europe.

Results: A total of 368 radiology professionals participated in the survey. Among them 65 % currently use teleradiology. The main usages are in-house image distribution (71 %) and on-call readings from home (44 %). The major advantages are improved collaboration with other radiologists (46 %) and efficient distribution of workload (38 %). Outsourcing is performed by 35 % of the participants, among them 68 % use commercial services. The major advantages of outsourcing are availability of second opinions (82 %) and additional capacity for on-call services (71 %). The major disadvantages are insufficient integration of patient history and priors (69 %), and limited communication with clinicians (68 %). The majority expressed a positive opinion regarding the future of teleradiology (80 %) predicting a growing importance (46 %). Opportunities ought to be found in emergency reading services, flexible support of small practices and in collaborative platforms.

Conclusions: A wide usage of teleradiology throughout Europe is perceived; however usage of commercial services is relatively limited. Regarding cross-border services, there is a great demand for a focused Pan-European legislation, an adapted price regulation and a quality assurance framework.

Main messages: • A wide variety of teleradiology applications exist in Europe • Implementation mainly occurs in countries with a high concentration of networked PACS • Usage of commercial teleradiology services in Europe is relatively limited • Language is an unsolved issue and limiting factor for further deployment of services • There is a demand for a Pan-European legislation, price regulation and quality assurance framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The numbers in this table represent the number of inhabitants per radiologist for each corresponding EU member state (figures include residents in training) [26]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. ESR (2006) VII Telerad white paper. Available via http://www.myesr.org. Accessed 14 Oct 2011
    1. Barneveld Binkhuysen FH, Ranschaert ER. Teleradiology: evolution and concepts. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:205–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross P, Sepper R, Pohjonen H. Cross-border teleradiology—experience from two international teleradiology projects. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deloitte & Ipsos Belgium (2011) eHealth Benchmarking III SMART 2009/0022 Final Report. 1–274. Available via http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/.... Accessed 23 Jan 2012
    1. Benjamin M, Aradi Y, Shreiber R. From shared data to sharing workflow: Merging PACS and teleradiology. Eur J Radiol. 2009;73:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.014. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources