Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
- PMID: 23249503
- PMCID: PMC3541952
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-146
Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
Abstract
Background: Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women ("Aboriginal women"). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women's health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach.
Methods: Using participatory research principles and guided by a postcolonial theoretical lens, the proposed mixed methods research will involve three phases. Phase I is an international systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions for Aboriginal peoples' health decision-making. Developed following dialogue with key stakeholders, proposed methods are guided by the Cochrane handbook and include a comprehensive search, screening by two independent researchers, and synthesis of findings. Phases II and III will be conducted in collaboration with Minwaashin Lodge and engage an urban Aboriginal community of women in an interpretive descriptive qualitative study. In Phase II, 10 to 13 Aboriginal women will be interviewed to explore their health/social decision-making experiences. The interview guide is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and previous decisional needs assessments, and as appropriate may be adapted to findings from the systematic review. Digitally-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify participant decision-making approaches and needs when making health/social decisions. In Phase III, there will be cultural adaptation of an SDM facilitation tool, the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide, by two focus groups consisting of five to seven Aboriginal women. The culturally adapted guide will undergo usability testing through individual interviews with five to six women who are about to make a health/social decision. Focus groups and individual interviews will be digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify the adaptation required and usability of the adapted decision guide.
Discussion: Findings from this research will produce a culturally sensitive intervention to facilitate SDM within a population of urban Aboriginal women, which can subsequently be evaluated to determine impacts on narrowing health/social decision-making inequities.
Similar articles
-
Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol.Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 1;4:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0085-3. eCollection 2018. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. PMID: 29507771 Free PMC article.
-
Cultural adaptation of a shared decision making tool with Aboriginal women: a qualitative study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jan 28;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0129-7. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015. PMID: 25889846 Free PMC article.
-
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol.BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e016400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29133314 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision aids in pregnancy care: A scoping review.Midwifery. 2020 Feb;81:102589. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102589. Epub 2019 Nov 23. Midwifery. 2020. PMID: 31790856
Cited by
-
The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report.Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1354-1361. doi: 10.1111/acem.13050. Epub 2016 Nov 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27404959 Free PMC article.
-
Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge.Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3. Implement Sci. 2017. PMID: 29258551 Free PMC article.
-
Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol.Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 1;4:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0085-3. eCollection 2018. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. PMID: 29507771 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Biologic Treatment Hesitancy Among Black and Indigenous Populations in Canada: a Review.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Apr;10(2):942-951. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01282-x. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023. PMID: 35476223 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An integrated knowledge translation approach to develop a shared decision-making strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care: a qualitative study.Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):192-204. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4729. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Curr Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31285666 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dagone T. For patient’s sake: Patient First review commissioner’s report to the Saskatchewan Minister of Health, Regina. 2009. http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/patient-first-review.
-
- O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ. Decisional Conflict: Supporting people experiencing uncertainty about options affecting their health. 2007. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/odsf.html.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical