Author’s response: A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: not only possible, but also inevitable
- PMID: 23251930
- PMCID: PMC3662963
- DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x12000635
Author’s response: A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: not only possible, but also inevitable
Abstract
I have argued that orthographic processing cannot be understood and modeled without considering the manner in which orthographic structure represents phonological, semantic, and morphological information in a given writing system. A reading theory, therefore, must be a theory of the interaction of the reader with his/her linguistic environment. This outlines a novel approach to studying and modeling visual word recognition, an approach that focuses on the common cognitive principles involved in processing printed words across different writing systems. These claims were challenged by several commentaries that contested the merits of my general theoretical agenda, the relevance of the evolution of writing systems, and the plausibility of finding commonalities in reading across orthographies. Other commentaries extended the scope of the debate by bringing into the discussion additional perspectives. My response addresses all these issues. By considering the constraints of neurobiology on modeling reading, developmental data, and a large scope of cross-linguistic evidence, I argue that front-end implementations of orthographic processing that do not stem from a comprehensive theory of the complex information conveyed by writing systems do not present a viable approach for understanding reading. The common principles by which writing systems have evolved to represent orthographic, phonological, and semantic information in a language reveal the critical distributional characteristics of orthographic structure that govern reading behavior. Models of reading should thus be learning models, primarily constrained by cross-linguistic developmental evidence that describes how the statistical properties of writing systems shape the characteristics of orthographic processing. When this approach is adopted, a universal model of reading is possible.
Comment on
-
Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):282-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000155. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929002
-
Writing systems: not optimal, but good enough.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):305-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000337. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929003
-
An even more universal model of reading: various effects of orthography on dyslexias.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):285-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000167. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929021
-
Visual word recognition models should also be constrained by knowledge about the visual system.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):287. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000179. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929059
-
Can evolution provide perfectly optimal solutions for a universal model of reading?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):279-80. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000015. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929084
-
Flashing out or fleshing out? A developmental perspective on a universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):289-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000180. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929106
-
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):281-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000027. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929120
-
Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):290-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000192. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929147
-
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):283-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000039. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929150
-
Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: a resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):292-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000209. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929177
-
Bringing development into a universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):284. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000040. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929181
-
Universals of reading: developmental evidence for linguistic plausibility.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):287-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000052. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929206
-
Beyond isolated word recognition.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):293-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000210. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929212
-
Visual perceptual limitations on letter position uncertainty in reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):294-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000222. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929297
-
Explaining word recognition, reading, the universe, and beyond: a modest proposal.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):288-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000064. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929307
-
Thru but not wisht: language, writing, and universal reading theory.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):299-300. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000234. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929328
-
Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):291-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000076. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929385
-
Rethinking phonological theories of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):303-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000246. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929405
-
No reason to expect "reading universals".Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):293. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000088. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929460
-
Phono-morpho-orthographic construal: the view from spelling.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):304. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000258. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929518
-
What and where is the word?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):295-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200009X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929541
-
The limitations of the reverse-engineering approach to cognitive modeling.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):305. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200026X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929543
-
Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):296-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000106. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929590
-
Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):307-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000271. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929596
-
Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):298-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000118. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929618
-
Towards a universal neurobiological architecture for learning to read.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):308-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000283. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929623
-
Vision, development, and bilingualism are fundamental in the quest for a universal model of visual word recognition and reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):300-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200012X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929657
-
Giving theories of reading a sporting chance.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):301-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000301. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929663
-
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):309-10. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000131. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929756
-
The case of the neglected alphasyllabary: orthographic processing in Devanagari.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):302-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000313. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929807
-
Beyond one-way streets: the interaction of phonology, morphology, and culture with orthography.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):280-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000143. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929865
-
Theories of reading should predict reading speed.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):297-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000325. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929907 Free PMC article.
-
Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):285. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000295. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22931560 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrews S. All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In: Andrews S, editor. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. New York: Psychology Press; 2006.
-
- Baayen RH, Milin P, Durdevic DF, Hendrix P, Marelli M. An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review. 2011;118:428–481. - PubMed
-
- Banai K, Ahissar M. Perceptual learning as a tool for boosting working memory among individuals with reading and learning disability. Learning & Perception. 2009;1:115–134.
-
- Bentin S, Frost R. Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory & Cognition. 1987;15:13–23. - PubMed
-
- Bertram R, Kuperman V, Baayen RH, Hyönä J. The hyphen as a segmentation cue in triconstituent compound processing: It’s getting better all the time. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2011;52:530–544. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources