Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec 19:7:39.
doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-39.

"Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail: our institutional experience and review of the literature"

Affiliations
Review

"Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail: our institutional experience and review of the literature"

Peter V Giannoudis et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome, union and complication rates after surgical treatment of unstable or displaced proximal humeral fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail, by reviewing our institutional experience and the relevant current literature.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients were treated operatively for proximal humeral fracture using the Polarus nail. Fractures were classified according to Neer's classification. A number of parameters including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, operative time, time to union and complications were recorded. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Constant Shoulder Score. A comparison among functional outcomes in patients >60 years in relation to the younger ones was performed. Moreover, a review of the literature was carried out to evaluate the overall union and complication rates.

Results: Two patients lost to follow-up were excluded from the analysis. For the twenty-five patients (mean age: 61 years), the mean follow-up was 36 months. There were 7 complications (28%), including one fixation failure, four protruded screws, one superficial infection and one case of impingement. The union rate was 96% (mean time to union: 4.2 months). The mean Constant score was 74.5 (range: 48-89). Patients under the age of 60 had a better functional outcome compared to patients >60 years of age (p<0.05). From the literature review and from a total of 215 patients treated with a Polarus nail, the mean union rate was 95.8%, the overall reported complication rate, including both minor and major complications, ranged widely from 9.3% up to 70%.

Conclusions: The Polarus nail was found to be an effective implant for stabilisation of proximal humeral fractures. Functional outcome is for the vast majority of the cases excellent or good, but in elderly patients a lower Constant score can be expected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A.A displaced 2-part proximal humeral fracture (A) treated with a short Polarus nail (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A displaced 2-part proximal humeral fracture in a 16 year-old boy (A) treated with a short Polarus nail (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A displaced 3-part proximal humeral fracture (A) treated with a short Polarus nail (B). The backed-out proximal screw was removed.

References

    1. Benger U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I. Changes in the incidence of fracture of the upper end of the humerus during a 30- year period: a study of 2125 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:179–182. - PubMed
    1. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Pollock RG. In: Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 4. Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. Fractures of the proximal humerus; pp. 1055–1107.
    1. Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, Lund B, McNair P, Transbold I. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3:127–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01623273. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zyto K, Wallace WA, Frostick SP, Preston BJ. Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(2):85–89. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90215-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures Part II: treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1090–1103. - PubMed