Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 20;14(6):e181.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.2123.

Should health organizations use web 2.0 media in times of an infectious disease crisis? An in-depth qualitative study of citizens' information behavior during an EHEC outbreak

Lex van Velsen  1 , Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen, Desirée J M A Beaujean, Jobke Wentzel, Jim E van Steenbergen
Affiliations

Should health organizations use web 2.0 media in times of an infectious disease crisis? An in-depth qualitative study of citizens' information behavior during an EHEC outbreak

Lex van Velsen et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Web 2.0 media (eg, Facebook, Wikipedia) are considered very valuable for communicating with citizens in times of crisis. However, in the case of infectious disease outbreaks, their value has not been determined empirically. In order to be able to take full advantage of Web 2.0 media in such a situation, the link between these media, citizens' information behavior, and citizens' information needs has to be investigated.

Objective: The goal of our study was to assess citizens' Web 2.0 media use during an infectious disease outbreak and to determine which Web 2.0 medium is used for which goal. With this information, we wanted to formulate recommendations for health organizations that consider using Web 2.0 media as part of their communication strategy during an infectious disease outbreak.

Methods: A total of 18 student participants kept an information diary for 4 weeks during the 2011 enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) outbreak in Germany. Of them, 9 lived at the epicenter of the outbreak and 9 of them at some distance. The diaries were supplemented by a qualitative pre-survey (demographics) and postsurvey (questioning their satisfaction with information provision during the outbreak).

Results: The Internet appeared to be the most popular medium for passively receiving EHEC-related information, with news websites and websites of newspapers as the most consulted sources. Twitter was used for receiving information to a small degree, while Facebook played virtually no role. Participants indicated that they thought information posted on Twitter or Facebook was not reliable or was out of place. When actively seeking information, online newspapers and wikis were important sources. Several causes for (dis)satisfaction with information provision were uncovered: source credibility, contradicting messages, and a need for closure.

Conclusions: During an infectious disease outbreak, our small sample of students did not see social media (like Facebook and Twitter) as suitable or reliable sources for communicating information, but primarily viewed them as a tool for communicating with friends. Wikis, however, did fill several information needs, especially when citizens are actively searching for information. For many, source credibility is an important asset of information usefulness. Finally, we provide several general recommendations for communicating with citizens during an infectious disease outbreak.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EHEC-related Information consumption by Dutch participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EHEC-related Information consumption by German participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Searches for EHEC information: topic and information source.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Glik DC. Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:33–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holmes BJ, Henrich N, Hancock S, Lestou V. Communicating with the public during health crises: experts' experiences and opinions. Journal of Risk Research. 2009;12(6):793–807. doi: 10.1080/13669870802648486. - DOI
    1. World Health organization Disease outbreaks. [2012-07-09]. 2012 http://www.who.int/topics/disease_outbreaks/en/
    1. Reynolds B, Galdo JH, Sokler L. Crisis and emergency risk communication. Atlanta: Center for disease control; 2002.
    1. Avery E. Contextual and audience moderators of channel selection and message reception of public health information in routine and crisis situations. Journal of Public Relations Research. 2010;22(4):378–403. doi: 10.1080/10627261003801404. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources