Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Jan;123(1):517-25.
doi: 10.1172/JCI65833. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

Prognostically relevant gene signatures of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prognostically relevant gene signatures of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Roel G W Verhaak et al. J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Because of the high risk of recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGS-OvCa), the development of outcome predictors could be valuable for patient stratification. Using the catalog of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we developed subtype and survival gene expression signatures, which, when combined, provide a prognostic model of HGS-OvCa classification, named "Classification of Ovarian Cancer" (CLOVAR). We validated CLOVAR on an independent dataset consisting of 879 HGS-OvCa expression profiles. The worst outcome group, accounting for 23% of all cases, was associated with a median survival of 23 months and a platinum resistance rate of 63%, versus a median survival of 46 months and platinum resistance rate of 23% in other cases. Associating the outcome prediction model with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status, residual disease after surgery, and disease stage further optimized outcome classification. Ovarian cancer is a disease in urgent need of more effective therapies. The spectrum of outcomes observed here and their association with CLOVAR signatures suggests variations in underlying tumor biology. Prospective validation of the CLOVAR model in the context of additional prognostic variables may provide a rationale for optimal combination of patient and treatment regimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. HGS-OvCa signature ssGSEA scores. ssGSEA scores for 489 HGS-OvCa tumor samples were generated using 4 previously described gene expression signatures (20): differentiated (D), immunoreactive (I), mesenchymal (M), and proliferative (P).
(A) Binary scores indicating whether a tumor sample activates the gene signature. Each column represents 1 sample; each row represents 1 gene signature. Red, activated; black, not activated. (B) Raw gene set activation scores. Each column represents 1 sample; each row represents 1 gene signature. (C) Scatter plots and r2 values (numbers within plots) for all gene set combinations.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Survival per CLOVAR subtype, CLOVAR survival class, and double classifiers.
Kaplan Meier curves for CLOVAR survival class (A), survival per CLOVAR subtype (B), and double classification of samples by both CLOVAR subtype and CLOVAR survival signature (C). Data represent survival capped at 60 months for 879 samples in the validation set. (D) A further significant difference in survival was observed between optimally and suboptimally debulked CLOVAR Mesenchymal/CLOVAR poor prognosis patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Survival analysis of multiple covariate outcome predictions.
A multiple covariate proportional hazards model was trained using (A) only CLOVAR survival and CLOVAR subtype signatures; (B) CLOVAR survival and CLOVAR subtype signatures, stage, grade, age, and residual disease; or (C) CLOVAR survival and CLOVAR subtype signatures, stage, grade, age, residual disease, and BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations. Models were trained on a training dataset (TCGA samples; n = 273) and tested on the validation set (n = 83), including all samples with nonmissing data on all variables. The difference in outcome of the 3 predicted groups was tested using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Comment in

References

    1. Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041842. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobel M, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(3):203–211. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181c042b6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bast RC, Jr, Hennessy B, Mills GB. The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(6):415–428. doi: 10.1038/nrc2644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markman M, et al. Phase III randomized trial of 12 versus 3 months of maintenance paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after complete response to platinum and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(13):2460–2465. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu JQ, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. Ca-a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2010;60(5):277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms