Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 May;162(5):1010-6.e1-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.021. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Evaluation of the liver injury unit scoring system to predict survival in a multinational study of pediatric acute liver failure

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluation of the liver injury unit scoring system to predict survival in a multinational study of pediatric acute liver failure

Brandy R Lu et al. J Pediatr. 2013 May.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the predictive value of the Liver Injury Units (LIU) and admission values (aLIU) of bilirubin and prothrombin time and international normalized ratio scores in a large cohort from the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure (PALF) Study Group, a multinational prospective study.

Study design: LIU and aLIU scores were calculated for 461 and 579 individuals, respectively, enrolled in the PALF study from 1999 to 2008. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to evaluate the scores with respect to survival without liver transplantation (LT), death, or LT by 21 days after enrollment.

Results: At 21 days, 50.3% of participants were alive without LT, 36.2% underwent LT, and 13.4% died. The c-indices for transplant-free survival were 0.81 based on the LIU score with the international normalized ratio (95% CI, 0.78-0.85) and 0.76 based on the aLIU score (95% CI, 0.72-0.79). The LIU score predicted LT better than it predicted death (c-index for LT 0.84, c-index for death 0.76).

Conclusion: Based on data from a large, multicenter cohort of patients with PALF, the LIU score was a better predictor of transplant-free survival than was the aLIU score. The LIU score might be a helpful, dynamic tool to predict clinical outcomes in patients with PALF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Distribution of the LIU score by previously derived quartiles using INR for participants from the PALF Study Group. Survival without LT with native liver is stratified by quartiles of the LIU score. LIU = 3.507 × peak total bilirubin (mg/dL) + 45.51 × peak INR (seconds) + 0.254 × peak ammonia (μmol/L). B, Distribution of the aLIU score by previously derived quartiles using INR for participants from the PALF Study Group. Survival without LT with native liver stratified by quartiles of the aLIU score. aLIU = 8.4 × admission bilirubin (mg/dL) + 50.0 × admission peak INR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Distribution of the LIU score by previously derived quartiles using PT on participants from the PALF Study Group. Survival without LT with native liver is stratified by quartiles of the LIU score. LIU = 3.584 × peak total bilirubin (mg/dL) + 1.809 peak × PT (seconds) + 0.307 × peak ammonia (μmol/L). B, Distribution of the aLIU score by previously derived quartiles using PT for participants from the PALF Study Group. Survival without LT with native liver stratified by quartiles of the aLIU score. aLIU = 6.9 × admission bilirubin (mg/dL) + 4.0 × admission peak PT (seconds).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, ROC curve of LIU score using INR for predicting 21-day outcome of death or LT versus LT-free survival (n = 461). B, ROC curve of LIU score using INR for predicting 21-day outcome of LT versus LT-free survival (n = 399). C, ROC curve of LIU score using INR for predicting 21-day outcome of death versus LT-free survival (n = 294).
Figure 4
Figure 4
A, Likelihood of LT divided by quartiles of the LIU score using INR in participants with PALF with an indeterminate diagnosis. B, Likelihood of death without LT divided by quartiles of the LIU score using INR in participants with PALF with an indeterminate diagnosis. C, Likelihood of transplantation divided by quartiles of the LIU score using INR in participants with PALF with a specified diagnosis. D, Likelihood of death without LT divided by quartiles of the LIU score using INR in participants with PALF with a specified diagnosis.

References

    1. Squires RH. Acute liver failure in children. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28:153–66. - PubMed
    1. Squires RH, Schneider BL, Bucuvalas J, Alonso E, Sokol RJ, Narkewicz MR, et al. Acute liver failure in children: the first 348 patients in the Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group. J Pediatr. 2006;148:652–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu E, MacKenzie T, Dobyns EL, Parikh CR, Karrer FM, Narkewicz MR, et al. Characterization of acute liver failure and development of a continuous risk of death staging system in children. J Hepatol. 2006;44:134–41. - PubMed
    1. Lu BR, Gralla J, Liu E, Dobyns EL, Narkewicz MR, Sokol RJ. Evaluation of a scoring system for assessing prognosis in pediatric acute liver failure. Clin Gastrohepatol. 2008;6:1140–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee WS, McKiernan P, Kelly DA. Etiology, outcome and prognostic indicators of childhood fulminant hepatic failure in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:575–81. - PubMed

Publication types