Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;34(2):98-106.
doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000179.

Analysis of the cost effectiveness of a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge

Dayna Atkins Whitmer  1 , David Lauren Woods
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Analysis of the cost effectiveness of a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge

Dayna Atkins Whitmer et al. Crisis. 2013.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The Golden Gate Bridge (GGB) is a well-known "suicide magnet" and the site of approximately 30 suicides per year. Recently, a suicide barrier was approved to prevent further suicides.

Aims: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the proposed suicide barrier, we compared the proposed costs of the barrier over a 20-year period ($51.6 million) to estimated reductions in mortality.

Method: We reviewed San Francisco and Golden Gate Bridge suicides over a 70-year period (1936-2006). We assumed that all suicides prevented by the barrier would attempt suicide with alternative methods and estimated the mortality reduction based on the difference in lethality between GGB jumps and other suicide methods. Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects.

Results: GGB suicides occur at a rate of approximately 30 per year, with a lethality of 98%. Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%. Assuming that unsuccessful suicides eventually committed suicide at previously reported (12-13%) rates, approximately 286 lives would be saved over a 20-year period at an average cost/life of approximately $180,419 i.e., roughly 6% of US Department of Transportation minimal VSL estimate ($3.2 million).

Conclusions: Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Suicide method by decade for San Francisco including Golden Gate Bridge jumps.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of suicide methods of San Francisco to California and United States.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Suicide deaths by jump site per decade in the San Francisco.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Golden Gate Bridge suicide victims as percentage of county of residence compared to percentage of county population for San Francisco Bay Area.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Influencing factors of suicide by sex and age group 1991–2006.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beautrais A. (2003). Suicide in New Zealand II: A review of risk factors and prevention. New Zealand Medical Journal, 116(1175), U461. - PubMed
    1. Beautrais A. (2007). Suicide by jumping: A review of research and prevention strategies. Crisis, 28(Suppl. 1), 58–63. doi 10.1027/0227-5910.28.S1.58 - PubMed
    1. Beautrais A., Fergusson D., Coggan C., Collings C., Doughty C., & Ellis P. (2007). Effective strategies for suicide prevention in New Zealand: A review of the evidence. New Zealand Medical Journal, 120(1251), U2459. - PubMed
    1. Beautrais A. L. (2001). Effectiveness of barriers at suicide jumping sites: A case study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 557–562. - PubMed
    1. Beautrais A. L., Gibb S. J., Fergusson D. M., Horwood L. J., & Larkin G. L. (2009). Removing bridge barriers stimulates suicides: An unfortunate natural experiment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 495–497. doi 10.1080/00048670902873714 - PubMed