Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 May;175(2):537-43.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326479.

Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique

Affiliations

Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique

P Steiger et al. Radiology. 1990 May.

Abstract

This study documents the relationship between different vertebral bone compartments with quantitative computed tomography (CT). Four distinct patient groups were investigated: healthy pre- and early postmenopausal women as well as healthy and osteoporotic late postmenopausal women. Three different regions of interest (ROIs) were employed: the elliptical ROI located in the anterior trabecular portion of the vertebral body, the peeled ROI of irregular shape that circumscribes most of the trabecular bone, and the integral ROI including all bone except for the transverse processes. Both single- and dual-energy quantitative CT techniques were employed at T-12 through L-3. Correlation between measurements in the elliptical and peeled ROIs was high (r = .985). The authors concluded that either ROI is acceptable for clinical use. The decrements in bone mineral density (BMD) for the integral ROI were smaller than those for the elliptical ROI. Dual-energy measurements were consistently higher than single-energy measurements. BMD as a function of vertebral level decreased systematically from T-12 to L-3. However, the average density of T-12 through L-3 can be accurately predicted by the average density of L-1 and L-2 (r = .997). Precision did not deteriorate significantly when BMD was expressed as the average of L-1 and L-2 (1.5%) instead of T-12 through L-3 (1.4%). In this study the data suggest a modified quantitative CT protocol for clinical applications in which BMD of only L-1 and L-2 are measured at a fixed gantry tilt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms