Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Nov;109(46):781-7.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia

Oliver Heidinger et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cancer screening programs must meet high standards for quality and effectiveness, because many healthy persons need to be screened to detect relatively few cases of cancer. In this study, we use the rate of interval cancers as an important surrogate indicator for evaluating the German mammography screening program (MSP).

Methods: All first-time participants in the MSP in the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia over the period 2005-2008 whose screening mammogram had been read as negative were followed over the next 24 months for the potential development of breast cancer (an "interval cancer" or IC). The screening data in the MSP database were compared in anonymized fashion with reports of cancer that were recorded at the Epidemiological Cancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia.

Results: Among the 878,764 women with negative screening mammograms in the first screening round, 2036 (23.2 per 10,000) developed an IC in the ensuing 24 months. These ICs accounted for 40% of all T2-T4 breast cancers occurring in first-time participants in the screening program in the 2 years after screening. The relative rate of IC compared to the background incidence of breast cancer before introduction of the MSP was 27% in the first year and 58% in the second. Screening detected 78% of all breast cancers that occurred during a maximum of 2 years after screening.

Conclusion: The IC rates in the implementation phase of the MSP agree with those found in other, established European programs. The present study is the first one to assess this important surrogate parameter to characterize the effectiveness of the German MSP among women in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's largest state by population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The importance of interval cancers for the German mammography screening program Interval cancers are both an important performance indicator (“internal quality assurance”) and an important surrogate indicator for evaluation of mortality (“efficacy”).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram showing the flow of data for anonymized comparison with data from the Epidemiological Cancer Registry NRW (North Rhine–Westphalia) KV-SafeNet, a secure reporting intranet used by the German Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KVen, Kassenärztliche Vereinigungen)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall evaluation of first-time screening in the North Rhine–Westphalia mammography screening program, 2005 to 2008 (WL = Westphalia–Lippe; NO = North Rhine)
Figure 4
Figure 4
T-category distribution of breast cancers before implementation of the German mammography screening program (MSP) (2002 to 2004) in the administrative area of Münster, versus breast cancers in first-time screening participants in 2005 to 2008, divided into screening-detected cancers and interval cancers *1 according to (4); *2 according to (5)

Comment in

  • German mammography screening program: quality assurance.
    Blettner M, Zeissig SR. Blettner M, et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov;109(46):779-80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0779. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012. PMID: 23264825 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Differentiation of breast cancers is missing.
    Weth G. Weth G. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Apr;110(14):253. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0253a. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 23616818 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • In reply.
    Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Weigel S, Heindel W, Hense HW. Heidinger O, et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Apr;110(14):253. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0253b. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 23616819 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Giersiepen K, Hense HW, Klug SJ, Antes G, Zeeb H. Planning, implementation and evaluation of cancer screening programs. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101:43–49. - PubMed
    1. Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Evidence and practice Oxford. Oxford University: Press; 2007. Screening.
    1. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, van Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. European Communities. (Fourth Edition) 2006
    1. Weigel S, Batzler WU, Decker T, Hense HW, Heindel W. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening. RoFo. 2009;18:1144–1150. - PubMed
    1. Biesheuvel C, Weigel S, Heindel W. Mammography Screening: Evidence, history and current practice in Germany and other European Countries. Breast Care. 2011:104–119. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources