Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;23(2):172-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling

Affiliations
Review

Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling

Karl Friston et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

This review considers state-of-the-art analyses of functional integration in neuronal macrocircuits. We focus on detecting and estimating directed connectivity in neuronal networks using Granger causality (GC) and dynamic causal modelling (DCM). These approaches are considered in the context of functional segregation and integration and--within functional integration--the distinction between functional and effective connectivity. We review recent developments that have enjoyed a rapid uptake in the discovery and quantification of functional brain architectures. GC and DCM have distinct and complementary ambitions that are usefully considered in relation to the detection of functional connectivity and the identification of models of effective connectivity. We highlight the basic ideas upon which they are grounded, provide a comparative evaluation and point to some outstanding issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A timeline of recent advances in Granger causality (top panel) and dynamic causal modelling (bottom panel). Entries above the time lines pertain to functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and those below the lines report specific developments for electrophysiology.

References

    1. Zeki S., Shipp S. The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature. 1988;335:311–317. - PubMed
    2. A short but important conceptual paper highlighting the importance of functional integration among specialised or segregated visual areas — and the hierarchical message passing supported by extrinsic (between area) and intrinsic (within area) connections.

    1. Friston K.J., Frith C.D., Liddle P.F., Frackowiak R.S. Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:5–14. - PubMed
    2. This paper introduced the distinction between functional and effective connectivity in brain imaging.

    1. Breakspear M. Dynamic connectivity in neural systems — theoretical and empirical considerations. Neuroinformatics. 2004;2:205–225. - PubMed
    1. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information maximisation approach to blind separation and blind de-convolution. Neural Comput. 1995;7:1129–1159. - PubMed
    1. Siegel M., Donner T.H., Engel A.K. Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:131–134. - PubMed

Publication types