Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990;19(1):37-41.
doi: 10.1007/BF00197927.

The diabetic foot: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation

Affiliations

The diabetic foot: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation

J Beltran et al. Skeletal Radiol. 1990.

Abstract

Fourteen diabetic patients with suspected foot infection and/or neuropathic joint (Charcot Joint) were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an attempt to assess the extent of the infection and also to distinguish infection from the changes seen with neuroarthropathy. The majority of patients with infection had more than one site of involvement and the following diagnoses were made by MRI evaluation: osteomyelitis (n = 8), abscess (n = 7), neuropathic joint (n = 5), septic arthritis (n = 4), and tenosynovitis (n = 4). Clinical or surgical/pathological confirmation of the MRI diagnoses was obtained in all but nine sites of infection or cases of neuropathic joint. If the two diagnostic categories of septic arthritis and tenosynovitis are excluded, all but four of the MRI diagnoses were confirmed. A distinctive pattern for neuroarthropathy was identified in five cases, consisting of low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images within the bone marrow space adjacent to the involved joint. We conclude that MRI is a valuable adjunct in the evaluation of the diabetic foot, and that it provides accurate information regarding the presence and extent of infection in this subset of patients. MRI has proven particularly helpful in differentiating neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 1977 Apr;123(1):123-9 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977 Sep;129(3):517-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1985 Jun 28;78(6B):218-24 - PubMed
    1. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986 Nov;15(4):889-916 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 Oct;137(4):721-3 - PubMed