Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):727-35.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267. Epub 2012 Dec 25.

Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey

Hardeep Singh  1 , Christiane Spitzmueller, Nancy J Petersen, Mona K Sawhney, Michael W Smith, Daniel R Murphy, Donna Espadas, Archana Laxmisan, Dean F Sittig
Affiliations

Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey

Hardeep Singh et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Context: Failure to notify patients of test results is common even when electronic health records (EHRs) are used to report results to practitioners. We sought to understand the broad range of social and technical factors that affect test result management in an integrated EHR-based health system.

Methods: Between June and November 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of all primary care practitioners (PCPs) within the Department of Veterans Affairs nationwide. Survey development was guided by a socio-technical model describing multiple inter-related dimensions of EHR use.

Findings: Of 5001 PCPs invited, 2590 (51.8%) responded. 55.5% believed that the EHRs did not have convenient features for notifying patients of test results. Over a third (37.9%) reported having staff support needed for notifying patients of test results. Many relied on the patient's next visit to notify them for normal (46.1%) and abnormal results (20.1%). Only 45.7% reported receiving adequate training on using the EHR notification system and 35.1% reported having an assigned contact for technical assistance with the EHR; most received help from colleagues (60.4%). A majority (85.6%) stayed after hours or came in on weekends to address notifications; less than a third reported receiving protected time (30.1%). PCPs strongly endorsed several new features to improve test result management, including better tracking and visualization of result notifications.

Conclusions: Despite an advanced EHR, both social and technical challenges exist in ensuring notification of test results to practitioners and patients. Current EHR technology requires significant improvement in order to avoid similar challenges elsewhere.

Keywords: diagnostic errors; electronic health records; health information technology; lack of follow-up; medical errors; missed test results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alert notification window in the VA Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of respondents within 21 Veterans Affairs Networks across the USA (Veterans Integrated Service Networks or VISNs).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wahls TL, Cram PM. The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1881–7 - PubMed
    1. Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, et al. Research in Ambulatory Patient Safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Am Med Assoc 2011. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/go/patientsafety. (accessed 3 Dec 2012)
    1. Wynia MK, Classen DC. Improving ambulatory patient safety. JAMA 2011;306:22 2504–5 - PubMed
    1. Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, et al. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2011 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types