[Transcranial motor evoked potentials monitoring for cerebral aneurysm surgery]
- PMID: 23269251
[Transcranial motor evoked potentials monitoring for cerebral aneurysm surgery]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial motor evoked potential(MEP)monitoring for aneurysm surgery.
Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing aneurysm surgery were included in the study. We recorded MEP responses at craniotomy, when dissecting the aneurysm and surrounding tissue, after clipping, and during temporary clipping of the parent artery. We examined the relations between MEP wave pattern change and postoperative motor function.
Results: In all of the patients MEPs were recordable for continuous neurophysiological monitoring of the vascular territory of interest throughout the surgery. In 16 patients, significant intraoperative MEP changes occurred. Of these patients, three patients presented with postoperative transient motor deficit. From the changes in MEP wave recording after aneurismal clipping and temporary occlusion of the parent artery. We speculated that the maximal time allowed for occlusion of the perforating arteries without ischemic damage is five minutes. Intraoperative MEP changes had a sensitivity of 100%(3/3)and specificity of 78.7%(48/61). The positive predictive value of postoperative motor deficit was 18.8%(3/16), and the negative predictive value was 100%(48/48). It was important to carry out MEP monitoring, so as not to produce false-negatives.
Conclusions: Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring is useful for predicting motor function after aneurysm surgery.
Similar articles
-
Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring during the surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.J Neurol Sci. 2010 Jun 15;293(1-2):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 Apr 20. J Neurol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20409559
-
Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51(1):15-22. doi: 10.2176/nmc.51.15. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011. PMID: 21273739
-
The efficacy of motor-evoked potentials on cerebral aneurysm surgery and new-onset postoperative motor deficits.J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Jul;22(3):247-51. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181de4eae. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 20548170
-
The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia.Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Apr;122(4):648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.001. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011. PMID: 20869304 Review.
-
False negative and positive motor evoked potentials in one patient: is single motor evoked potential monitoring reliable method? A case report and literature review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):E912-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8fabb. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20956881 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive Value of Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring during Surgery of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Cerebral Aneurysms.Asian J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):644-647. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_135_14. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 29114276 Free PMC article.
-
Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;13(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112803. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34199853 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical