Measuring medical student attitudes and beliefs regarding patients who are obese
- PMID: 23269296
- PMCID: PMC3826984
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c028d
Measuring medical student attitudes and beliefs regarding patients who are obese
Erratum in
-
Correction: Measuring Medical Student Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Patients Who Are Obese.Acad Med. 2018 May;93(5):793. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002190. Acad Med. 2018. PMID: 29688985 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Research shows obesity bias to undermine the patient-doctor relationship and lead to substandard care. The authors developed and tested an instrument to measure medical students' attitudes and beliefs about obese patients.
Method: The authors conducted a literature search to identify validated measures of obesity bias. Because they identified no appropriate scale, they decided to design a novel survey instrument: the Nutrition, Exercise and Weight Management (NEW) Attitudes Scale. An expert panel generated items which focus groups of third-year medical students then discussed. Next, experienced medical educators judged and weighted the remaining revised items. Then, second- and fourth-year medical students completed the scale alongside two previously validated measures of obesity bias, the Anti-Fat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA) and Beliefs About Obese Persons Scale (BAOP). Third-year students completed the NEW Attitudes Scale before and after a simulated encounter with an obese standardized patient instructor. The authors tested the validity and reliability.
Results: The final instrument comprised 31 items. A sample of 201 judges rated the items. A sample of 111 second- and fourth-year medical students completed the survey (mean score 24.4, range -37 to 76 out of a possible -118 to 118; higher scores indicate more positive attitudes). Pearson correlations between the NEW Attitudes Scale and AFA and BAOP were, respectively, -0.47 and 0.23. Test-retest reliability was 0.89. Students scored 27% higher after completing the standardized patient-instructor encounter (P < .001).
Conclusion: The NEW Attitudes Scale has good validity and reliability and may be used in future studies.
Figures
References
-
- US Obesity Trends, CDC http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html.
-
- Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–1209. - PubMed
-
- Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obes. 2008;16:1129–1134. - PubMed
-
- Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD. Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes. 2008;32:992–1000. - PubMed
-
- Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obes. 2009;17:941–964. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
