Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor
- PMID: 23269519
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-1039-0
Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor
Abstract
Purpose: Neoadjuvant treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinomas. Despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage dies from tumor recurrence. The aim of this retrospective exploratory study from two academic centers was to identify predictors of survival and recurrence in histopathologically responding patients.
Methods: Two hundred thirty one patients with adenocarcinomas (esophagus: n = 185, stomach: n = 46, cT3/4, cN0/+, cM0) treated with preoperative chemotherapy (n = 212) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19) followed by resection achieved a histopathological response (regression 1a: no residual tumor (n = 58), and regression 1b < 10 % residual tumor (n = 173)).
Results: The estimated median overall survival was 92.4 months (5-year survival, 56.6 %) for all patients. For patients with regression 1a, median survival is not reached (5-year survival, 71.6 %) compared to patients with regression 1b with 75.3 months median (5-year survival, 52.2 %) (p = 0.031). Patients with a regression 1a had lymph node metastases in 19.0 versus 33.7 % in regression 1b. The ypT-category (p < 0.001), the M-category (p = 0.005), and the type of treatment (p = 0.04) were found to be independent prognostic factors in R0-resected patients. The recurrence rate was 31.7 % (n = 66) (local, 39.4 %; peritoneal carcinomatosis, 25.7 %; distant metastases, 50 %). Recurrence was predicted by female gender (p = 0.013), ypT-category (p = 0.007), and M-category (p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Response of the primary tumor does not guarantee recurrence-free long-term survival, but histopathological complete responders have better prognosis compared to partial responders. Established prognostic factors strongly influence the outcome, which could, in the future, be used for stratification of adjuvant treatment approaches. Increasing the rate of histopathological complete responders is a valid endpoint for future clinical trials investigating new drugs.
Similar articles
-
Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach?Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May;21(5):1739-48. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3462-z. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24419755
-
A reliable risk score for stage IV esophagogastric cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;39(8):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Jan 31. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23375470
-
The prognostic value of residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients with complete primary tumor response.J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):597-602. doi: 10.1002/jso.24050. Epub 2015 Sep 23. J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26394724
-
The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract.Eur J Med Res. 2011 Jun 21;16(6):265-74. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-16-6-265. Eur J Med Res. 2011. PMID: 21810561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative systemic therapy as a part of comprehensive multimodal treatment in esophageal and gastric cancer - new treatment guidelines.Rozhl Chir. 2024;103(11):443-453. doi: 10.48095/ccrvch2024443. Rozhl Chir. 2024. PMID: 39645403 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer: Should we use prognostic factors to select patients?World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 21;22(3):1131-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1131. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26811652 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and evaluation of the Newstage system: integrating tumor regression grade and lymph node status for improved prognostication in neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 10;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03291-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38195570 Free PMC article.
-
IASLC Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Pathologic Assessment of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy.J Thorac Oncol. 2020 May;15(5):709-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 28. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32004713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system.Gastric Cancer. 2018 Nov;21(6):977-987. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0830-1. Epub 2018 May 10. Gastric Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29748876
-
Prognostic nomogram for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction patients with and without neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jan 15;14(1):135-149. eCollection 2022. Am J Transl Res. 2022. PMID: 35173834 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical