Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;99(1):46-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Dec 25.

CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases

E Cavaignac  1 , M Lecoq, A Ponsot, A Moine, N Bonnevialle, P Mansat, N Sans, P Bonnevialle
Affiliations
Free article

CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases

E Cavaignac et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: The reproducibility of various classification systems for trochanteric fractures is poor. This problem could be related to a lack of readability when using conventional X-rays.

Hypothesis: Computed tomography scanning (CT scan) will improve the interobserver reproducibility of the AO classification for trochanteric fractures.

Patients and methods: This was a prospective, observational, descriptive study following a group of 53 patients with trochanteric fractures. The fractures were evaluated with conventional X-rays, CT scan slices and 3D reconstruction (3DR). The resulting images were blinded and analysed by two observers using two classification systems: AO and Evans modified by Jensen (EVJE). A sample size of 53 was needed to show an improvement in the interobserver reproducibility when deciding the AO classification type with CT scan images. Kappa coefficients were used to measure interobserver reproducibility and agreement; agreement is the degree of consistency in the analysis by one observer who views the same fracture on two different imaging modalities.

Results: The interobserver reproducibility for the AO classification was 0.28 for X-rays, 0.33 for CT scan and 0.28 for 3DR. For the EVJE classification, these coefficients were 0.50 for X-rays, 0.35 for CT scan and 0.47 for 3DR. The agreement rate between the two imaging modalities was between 0.38 and 0.58 for X-rays/CT scan and between 0.79 and 0.86 for CT scan/3DR.

Discussion: The primary objective of this study was not achieved. CT imaging does not improve the interobserver reproducibility of various classification systems for trochanteric fractures. However, by providing images as slices, the complex nature of fractures in this area was revealed. The challenges related to classifying various fractures are not exclusively related to a "readability" problem, but also an understanding and analysis problem.

Level of evidence: Prospective diagnostic study, level III.

PubMed Disclaimer