Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case-control study
- PMID: 23271271
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2688-3
Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case-control study
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and early outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer.
Methods: A total of 97 patients diagnosed with upper- and middle-third stage cT1-T2 gastric cancer were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy group (LATG, n = 41) or the open total gastrectomy group (OTG, n = 56). All patients underwent total gastrectomy with modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy. The operative and postoperative measures, number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), and complications were compared between the two groups.
Results: The mean number of dissected LNs was not significantly different between the two groups: 23.1 ± 8.0 in the LATG group versus 24.2 ± 7.5 in the OTG group. Compared with the OTG group, the LATG group had less operative blood loss [104.2 ± 42.9 vs. 355.6 ± 51.3 ml (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to out-of-bed activities [14.4 ± 3.2 vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 h (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to first flatus [72.2 ± 16.2 vs. 78.4 ± 8.6 h (p = 0.017)], earlier resumption of soft diet [52.8 ± 21.6 vs. 74.2 ± 12.2 h (p < 0.0001)], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [9.7 ± 2.2 vs. 13.6 ± 3.6 days (p < 0.0001)]. However, LATG had a slightly longer operating time than OTG [235.7 ± 38.5 vs. 211.5 ± 33.2 min (p = 0.001)]. The operative complications rates for the LATG and OTG groups were not significantly different: 4.9 versus 5.4 %.
Conclusion: For upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer, a limited splenic hilar lymphadenectomy strategy seems to be safe and feasible, particularly for the number of retrieved LNs. However, this technique is not suitable for cT3 disease.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 28;19(32):5365-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5365. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23983442 Free PMC article.
-
A matched cohort study of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer without serosa invasion.Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(3):403-7. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014. PMID: 24451941
-
Laparoscopy-assisted pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastrectomy.Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2416-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0371-0. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19266232
-
Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1202-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2218-1. Epub 2013 May 17. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013. PMID: 23681826
-
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy as a valid procedure to treat gastric cancer option both in early and advanced stage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Aug 23. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31477462
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088753. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24558421 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 28;19(32):5365-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5365. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23983442 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric Cancer. 2015 Apr;18(2):218-26. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0474-3. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Gastric Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25666184
-
Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct;139(10):1721-34. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1462-9. Epub 2013 Aug 30. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23990014 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Outcomes Analysis Comparing Open, Lap-Assisted, Totally Laparoscopic, and Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;16(19):3404. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193404. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39410024 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical