Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;24(3):421-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0127-3. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Baseline E(2) levels are higher in BRCA2 mutation carriers: a potential target for prevention?

Affiliations

Baseline E(2) levels are higher in BRCA2 mutation carriers: a potential target for prevention?

Jayeon Kim et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: BRCA gene mutations and elevated serum estradiol (E(2)) are well-known risk factors for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between BRCA gene mutations and serum E(2) level.

Methods: We measured baseline (menstrual cycle day 2-3) E(2) levels of 96 women with breast cancer who underwent BRCA testing.

Results: The mean age, parity, and age at menarche did not differ between women with and without BRCA1/2 mutations. Basal serum E(2) level was significantly higher in women with BRCA2 mutations compared to women with BRCA1 mutations or without BRCA mutations (71.7 ± 41.6 vs. 45.5 ± 20.7 vs. 38.5 ± 12.6 pg/ml in BRCA2 mutation carriers, BRCA1 mutation carriers, and non-carriers, respectively, p value = 0.03). Women with BRCA2 mutations had 3.1 times as great risk for high basal E(2) level (>48 pg/ml) as women without BRCA mutations after adjusting for age and BMI (95 % confidence interval: 1.3, 7.6). BRCA mutation carriers with high serum E(2) level were significantly younger than the carriers with low serum E(2) level (31.4 ± 3.1 vs. 34.7 ± 4.9 years, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: In this pilot study, we found an association between high basal serum E(2) levels and BRCA2 mutations. Our results suggest that increased production of E(2) may have a role in the pathogenesis of BRCA2-mutation-related breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of basal serum estradiol (E2) levels by BRCA mutation status
The upper and lower T bars denote maximum and minimum values, respectively. The lines inside the plot boxes denote median values and dots denote mean values. The numbers above the upper T bars denotes “mean baseline serum E2 levels ± standard deviation” in each group. ap<0.017 compared to BRCA(−) group analyzed by multiple comparisons with a Bonferroni adjustment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):229–239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–1130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676–689. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhong Q, Chen CF, Li S, Chen Y, Wang CC, Xiao J, Chen PL, Sharp ZD, Lee WH. Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11-p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science. 1999;285(5428):747–750. - PubMed
    1. Oktay K, Kim JY, Barad D, Babayev SN. Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):240–244. - PMC - PubMed