Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2013 Jan;131(1):95-105.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729e3c.

Reconstruction of distal limb defects with the free medial sural artery perforator flap

Affiliations
Case Reports

Reconstruction of distal limb defects with the free medial sural artery perforator flap

Xin Wang et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The medial sural artery perforator flap is a reliable cutaneous flap that can be used for soft-tissue reconstruction in the extremities. The purposes of this article are to fully document the vascular basis of the medial sural artery flap and to report its use in reconstruction of distal extremities.

Methods: Ten fresh cadavers were injected with a standardized injection of lead oxide for three-dimensional visualization reconstruction using a spiral computed tomography scanner and specialized software (Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System). The origin, course, and distribution of the medial sural artery perforator in the posterior leg region were observed. Between April of 2007 and December of 2010, the authors used the free medial sural artery perforator flap for distal limb reconstruction in 34 clinical cases. Flaps size varied from 5.5 × 4.5 cm to 14 × 9 cm.

Results: The average diameter of medial sural artery perforators was 0.9 ± 0.2 mm, with each perforator supplying an average territory of 55 ± 20 cm. Extensive anastomoses were found between the medial sural artery perforators and multiple adjacent source arteries. Twenty-nine flaps (85.3 percent) fully survived and five (14.7 percent) underwent partial necrosis. Follow-up observations were conducted for 6 to 21 months, and the cosmetic results were satisfactory and without apparent bulkiness.

Conclusions: The free medial sural artery perforator flap transfer is appropriate for extremity defect reconstruction. The donor site not only supplies a thin skin flap but also provides the option to harvest a cross-boundary perforator flaps that could be useful for repairing widespread traumatic soft-tissue defects.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pontén B. The fasciocutaneous flap: Its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg. 1981;34:215–220.
    1. Walton RL, Bunkis J. The posterior calf fasciocutaneous free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:76–85.
    1. Satoh K, Fukuya F, Matsui A, Onizuka T. Lower leg reconstruction using a sural fasciocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23:97–103.
    1. Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: Evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:90–99.
    1. Taylor GI, Daniel RK. The anatomy of several free flap donor sites. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56:243–253.

MeSH terms